[PATCH -next] net: phy: micrel: use min() macro instead of doing it manually

Subsystems: ethernet phy library, networking drivers, the rest

STALE1755d

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-12-24 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH -next] net: phy: micrel: use min() macro instead of doing it manually

From: Yang Li <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-24 09:12:22

Fix following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/net/phy/micrel.c:1482:12-13: WARNING opportunity for min()

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
index c6a97fcca0e6..dda426596445 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ static int ksz886x_cable_test_wait_for_completion(struct phy_device *phydev)
 				    !(val & KSZ8081_LMD_ENABLE_TEST),
 				    30000, 100000, true);
 
-	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
+	return min(ret, 0);
 }
 
 static int ksz886x_cable_test_one_pair(struct phy_device *phydev, int pair)
-- 
2.20.1.7.g153144c

Re: [PATCH -next] net: phy: micrel: use min() macro instead of doing it manually

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-12-24 09:30:48

On 24.12.2021 10:12, Yang Li wrote:
Fix following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/net/phy/micrel.c:1482:12-13: WARNING opportunity for min()
Please always check whether a coccicheck warning makes sense,
and don't create "fixes" mechanically w/o thinking.
Here using min() doesn't make sense because it's not about a
numerical operation. ret < 0 is equivalent to is_err(ret).

quoted hunk
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
index c6a97fcca0e6..dda426596445 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ static int ksz886x_cable_test_wait_for_completion(struct phy_device *phydev)
 				    !(val & KSZ8081_LMD_ENABLE_TEST),
 				    30000, 100000, true);
 
-	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
+	return min(ret, 0);
 }
 
 static int ksz886x_cable_test_one_pair(struct phy_device *phydev, int pair)

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help