Some callers (e.g. sctp_sf_violation_chunk) passes NULL to
asoc argument of sctp_sf_violation. So, it should check it
before calling sctp_vtag_verify().
Probably it could be exploited by a malicious SCTP packet
to cause NULL pointer dereference.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <redacted>
Fixes: aa0f697e4528 ("sctp: add vtag check in sctp_sf_violation")
---
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -4669,7 +4669,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_violation(struct net *net,{structsctp_chunk*chunk=arg;-if(!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk,asoc))+if(asoc&&!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk,asoc))returnsctp_sf_pdiscard(net,ep,asoc,type,arg,commands);/* Make sure that the chunk has a valid length. */
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Date: 2021-11-03 12:44:02
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:27 PM Alexey Khoroshilov [off-list ref] wrote:
Some callers (e.g. sctp_sf_violation_chunk) passes NULL to
asoc argument of sctp_sf_violation. So, it should check it
before calling sctp_vtag_verify().
Probably it could be exploited by a malicious SCTP packet
to cause NULL pointer dereference.
I don't think asoc can be NULL in here, did you see any call trace
caused by it?
If this was found by a tool, please remove the unnecessary call from
sctp_sf_violation_chunk() instead:
@@ -4893,9 +4893,6 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_violation_chunk( { static const char err_str[] = "The following chunk violates protocol:";- if (!asoc)- return sctp_sf_violation(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);-
Thanks.
quoted hunk
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <redacted>
Fixes: aa0f697e4528 ("sctp: add vtag check in sctp_sf_violation")
---
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -4669,7 +4669,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_violation(struct net *net,{structsctp_chunk*chunk=arg;-if(!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk,asoc))+if(asoc&&!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk,asoc))returnsctp_sf_pdiscard(net,ep,asoc,type,arg,commands);/* Make sure that the chunk has a valid length. */--
sctp_sf_violation_chunk() is not called with asoc argument equal to NULL,
but if that happens it would lead to NULL pointer dereference
in sctp_vtag_verify().
The patch removes code that handles NULL asoc in sctp_sf_violation_chunk().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <redacted>
Proposed-by: Xin Long [off-list ref]
---
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller [off-list ref]:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 20:30:27 +0300 you wrote:
sctp_sf_violation_chunk() is not called with asoc argument equal to NULL,
but if that happens it would lead to NULL pointer dereference
in sctp_vtag_verify().
The patch removes code that handles NULL asoc in sctp_sf_violation_chunk().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
[...]