[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix xdpxceiver failures for no hugepages
From: Tirthendu Sarkar <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-17 12:45:10
xsk_configure_umem() needs hugepages to work in unaligned mode. So when hugepages are not configured, 'unaligned' tests should be skipped which is determined by the helper function hugepages_present(). This function erroneously returns true with MAP_NORESERVE flag even when no hugepages are configured. The removal of this flag fixes the issue. The test TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC also needs to be skipped when there are no hugepages. However, this was not skipped as there was no check for presence of hugepages and hence was failing. The check to skip the test has now been added. Fixes: a4ba98dd0c693 (selftests: xsk: Add test for unaligned mode) Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
index fe7f423b8c3f..040164c7efc1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c@@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ static bool hugepages_present(struct ifobject *ifobject) void *bufs; bufs = mmap(NULL, mmap_sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, - MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE | MAP_HUGETLB, -1, 0); + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB, -1, 0); if (bufs == MAP_FAILED) return false;
@@ -1364,6 +1364,10 @@ static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test, enum test_mode mode, enum test_ testapp_invalid_desc(test); break; case TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC: + if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) { + ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n"); + return; + } test_spec_set_name(test, "UNALIGNED_INV_DESC"); test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true;
--
2.25.1