-	if ((netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TC) > (features & NETIF_F_HW_TC) &&
+	if ((netdev_active_features_test_bit(netdev, NETIF_F_HW_TC_BIT) >
+	    netdev_features_test_bit(NETIF_F_NTUPLE_BIT, features)) &&

Using > is interesting.

But where did NETIF_F_NTUPLE_BIT come from?

-	netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER |
-		NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
-		NETIF_F_RXCSUM | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_GSO |
-		NETIF_F_GRO | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 | NETIF_F_GSO_GRE |
-		NETIF_F_GSO_GRE_CSUM | NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL |
-		NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST;
+	netdev_features_zero(&features);
+	netdev_features_set_array(hns3_default_features_array,
+				  ARRAY_SIZE(hns3_default_features_array),
+				  &features);

The original code is netdev->features |= so it is appending these
bits. Yet the first thing the new code does is zero features?

      Andrew