Introduce a new helper, pcie_aspm_capable(), to report ASPM capability.
The user will be introduced by next patch.
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
---
v6:
v5:
- No change.
v4:
- Report aspm_capable instead.
v3:
- This is a new patch
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
@@ -1639,6 +1639,7 @@ int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);voidpcie_no_aspm(void);boolpcie_aspm_support_enabled(void);boolpcie_aspm_enabled(structpci_dev*pdev);+boolpcie_aspm_capable(structpci_dev*pdev);#elsestaticinlineintpci_disable_link_state(structpci_dev*pdev,intstate){return0;}
@@ -1647,6 +1648,7 @@ static inline int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)staticinlinevoidpcie_no_aspm(void){}staticinlineboolpcie_aspm_support_enabled(void){returnfalse;}staticinlineboolpcie_aspm_enabled(structpci_dev*pdev){returnfalse;}+staticinlineboolpcie_aspm_capable(structpci_dev*pdev){returnfalse;}#endif#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
To really enable ASPM on r8169 NICs, both standard PCIe ASPM and
chip-specific ASPM have to be enabled at the same time.
Since PCIe ASPM can be enabled or disabled vis sysfs and there's no
mechanism to notify driver about ASPM change, unconditionally enable
chip-specific ASPM to make ASPM really take into effect.
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
---
v6:
- Unconditionally enable chip-specific ASPM.
v5:
- New patch.
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -2664,8 +2663,13 @@ static void rtl_enable_exit_l1(struct rtl8169_private *tp)staticvoidrtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(structrtl8169_private*tp,boolenable){-/* Don't enable ASPM in the chip if OS can't control ASPM */-if(enable&&tp->aspm_manageable){+structpci_dev*pdev=tp->pci_dev;++/* Skip if PCIe ASPM isn't possible */+if(!pcie_aspm_support_enabled()||!pcie_aspm_capable(pdev))+return;++if(enable){RTL_W8(tp,Config5,RTL_R8(tp,Config5)|ASPM_en);RTL_W8(tp,Config2,RTL_R8(tp,Config2)|ClkReqEn);}else{
@@ -5272,8 +5276,7 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)/* Disable ASPM L1 as that cause random device stop working*problemsaswellasfullsystemhangsforsomePCIedevicesusers.*/-rc=pci_disable_link_state(pdev,PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);-tp->aspm_manageable=!rc;+pci_disable_link_state(pdev,PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);/* enable device (incl. PCI PM wakeup and hotplug setup) */rc=pcim_enable_device(pdev);
r8169 NICs on some platforms have abysmal speed when ASPM is enabled.
Same issue can be observed with older vendor drivers.
The issue is however solved by the latest vendor driver. There's a new
mechanism, which disables r8169's internal ASPM when the NIC traffic has
more than 10 packets per second, and vice versa. The possible reason for
this is likely because the buffer on the chip is too small for its ASPM
exit latency.
Realtek confirmed that all their PCIe LAN NICs, r8106, r8168 and r8125
use dynamic ASPM under Windows. So implement the same mechanism here to
resolve the issue.
Also introduce a lock to prevent race on accessing config registers.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214307
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
---
v6:
- Wording change.
- Add bugzilla link.
v5:
- Split out aspm_manageable replacement as another patch.
- Introduce a lock for lock_config_regs() and unlock_config_regs().
v4:
- Squash two patches
- Remove aspm_manageable and use pcie_aspm_capable()
pcie_aspm_enabled() accordingly
v3:
- Use msecs_to_jiffies() for delay time
- Use atomic_t instead of mutex for bh
- Mention the buffer size and ASPM exit latency in commit message
v2:
- Use delayed_work instead of timer_list to avoid interrupt context
- Use mutex to serialize packet counter read/write
- Wording change
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:15:52AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
r8169 NICs on some platforms have abysmal speed when ASPM is enabled.
Same issue can be observed with older vendor drivers.
The issue is however solved by the latest vendor driver. There's a new
mechanism, which disables r8169's internal ASPM when the NIC traffic has
more than 10 packets per second, and vice versa. The possible reason for
this is likely because the buffer on the chip is too small for its ASPM
exit latency.
Because the NIC works fine on some platforms with ASPM fully enabled,
I would describe this as a "workaround" for a bug where we don't know
the root cause, not a "solution".
Realtek confirmed that all their PCIe LAN NICs, r8106, r8168 and r8125
use dynamic ASPM under Windows. So implement the same mechanism here to
resolve the issue.
Also introduce a lock to prevent race on accessing config registers.
Strictly speaking, the addition of the lock should be a separate patch
since it's not directly related to the ASPM change.
A little more below...
quoted hunk
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214307
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
---
v6:
- Wording change.
- Add bugzilla link.
v5:
- Split out aspm_manageable replacement as another patch.
- Introduce a lock for lock_config_regs() and unlock_config_regs().
v4:
- Squash two patches
- Remove aspm_manageable and use pcie_aspm_capable()
pcie_aspm_enabled() accordingly
v3:
- Use msecs_to_jiffies() for delay time
- Use atomic_t instead of mutex for bh
- Mention the buffer size and ASPM exit latency in commit message
v2:
- Use delayed_work instead of timer_list to avoid interrupt context
- Use mutex to serialize packet counter read/write
- Wording change
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
IIUC the way the "dynamic ASPM" works is that rtl8169_aspm_toggle()
runs every second (1000ms). If the NIC has sent or received fewer
than 10 packets in the last second, you make sure ASPM is enabled. If
it has sent or received more than 10 packets, you disable ASPM.
Since the disable is done in rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable() with
chip-specific registers, I suppose lspci and the like still show ASPM
as being enabled. Not really a problem, I guess.
It looks like this disables ASPM completely, even though the NIC
apparently works correctly with L0s and L1.1 enabled, right?
I suppose that on the Intel system, if we enable ASPM, the link goes
to L1.2, and the NIC immediately receives 1000 packets in that second
before we can disable ASPM again, we probably drop a few packets?
Whereas on the AMD system, we probably *never* drop any packets even
with L1.2 enabled all the time?
And if we actually knew the root cause and could set the correct LTR
values or whatever is wrong on the Intel system, we probably wouldn't
need this dynamic scheme?
@@ -4686,6 +4729,10 @@ static void rtl8169_up(struct rtl8169_private *tp) rtl_reset_work(tp); phy_start(tp->phydev);++ /* pcie_aspm_capable may change after system resume */+ if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled() && pcie_aspm_capable(tp->pci_dev))+ schedule_delayed_work(&tp->aspm_toggle, 0); } static int rtl8169_close(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -5273,11 +5320,6 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) if (rc) return rc;- /* Disable ASPM L1 as that cause random device stop working- * problems as well as full system hangs for some PCIe devices users.- */- pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);- /* enable device (incl. PCI PM wakeup and hotplug setup) */ rc = pcim_enable_device(pdev); if (rc < 0) {
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:15:52AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
quoted
r8169 NICs on some platforms have abysmal speed when ASPM is enabled.
Same issue can be observed with older vendor drivers.
The issue is however solved by the latest vendor driver. There's a new
mechanism, which disables r8169's internal ASPM when the NIC traffic has
more than 10 packets per second, and vice versa. The possible reason for
this is likely because the buffer on the chip is too small for its ASPM
exit latency.
Because the NIC works fine on some platforms with ASPM fully enabled,
I would describe this as a "workaround" for a bug where we don't know
the root cause, not a "solution".
OK, will change the wording.
quoted
Realtek confirmed that all their PCIe LAN NICs, r8106, r8168 and r8125
use dynamic ASPM under Windows. So implement the same mechanism here to
resolve the issue.
Also introduce a lock to prevent race on accessing config registers.
Strictly speaking, the addition of the lock should be a separate patch
since it's not directly related to the ASPM change.
Will separate it to another patch.
A little more below...
quoted
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214307
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
---
v6:
- Wording change.
- Add bugzilla link.
v5:
- Split out aspm_manageable replacement as another patch.
- Introduce a lock for lock_config_regs() and unlock_config_regs().
v4:
- Squash two patches
- Remove aspm_manageable and use pcie_aspm_capable()
pcie_aspm_enabled() accordingly
v3:
- Use msecs_to_jiffies() for delay time
- Use atomic_t instead of mutex for bh
- Mention the buffer size and ASPM exit latency in commit message
v2:
- Use delayed_work instead of timer_list to avoid interrupt context
- Use mutex to serialize packet counter read/write
- Wording change
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
IIUC the way the "dynamic ASPM" works is that rtl8169_aspm_toggle()
runs every second (1000ms). If the NIC has sent or received fewer
than 10 packets in the last second, you make sure ASPM is enabled. If
it has sent or received more than 10 packets, you disable ASPM.
Yes, this is what this patch does.
Since the disable is done in rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable() with
chip-specific registers, I suppose lspci and the like still show ASPM
as being enabled. Not really a problem, I guess.
It looks like this disables ASPM completely, even though the NIC
apparently works correctly with L0s and L1.1 enabled, right?
I've seen bug reports that ASPM L0s and L1.1 caused the NIC stops to working.
So dynamic ASPM strikes the right
I suppose that on the Intel system, if we enable ASPM, the link goes
to L1.2, and the NIC immediately receives 1000 packets in that second
before we can disable ASPM again, we probably drop a few packets?
Whereas on the AMD system, we probably *never* drop any packets even
with L1.2 enabled all the time?
Yes and yes.
And if we actually knew the root cause and could set the correct LTR
values or whatever is wrong on the Intel system, we probably wouldn't
need this dynamic scheme?
Because Realtek already implemented the dynamic ASPM workaround in
their Windows and Linux driver, they never bother to find the root
cause.
So we'll never know what really happens here.
Kai-Heng
@@ -4686,6 +4729,10 @@ static void rtl8169_up(struct rtl8169_private *tp) rtl_reset_work(tp); phy_start(tp->phydev);++ /* pcie_aspm_capable may change after system resume */+ if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled() && pcie_aspm_capable(tp->pci_dev))+ schedule_delayed_work(&tp->aspm_toggle, 0); } static int rtl8169_close(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -5273,11 +5320,6 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) if (rc) return rc;- /* Disable ASPM L1 as that cause random device stop working- * problems as well as full system hangs for some PCIe devices users.- */- pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);- /* enable device (incl. PCI PM wakeup and hotplug setup) */ rc = pcim_enable_device(pdev); if (rc < 0) {
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:15:52AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
quoted
r8169 NICs on some platforms have abysmal speed when ASPM is enabled.
Same issue can be observed with older vendor drivers.
The issue is however solved by the latest vendor driver. There's a new
mechanism, which disables r8169's internal ASPM when the NIC traffic has
more than 10 packets per second, and vice versa. The possible reason for
this is likely because the buffer on the chip is too small for its ASPM
exit latency.
...
quoted
I suppose that on the Intel system, if we enable ASPM, the link goes
to L1.2, and the NIC immediately receives 1000 packets in that second
before we can disable ASPM again, we probably drop a few packets?
Whereas on the AMD system, we probably *never* drop any packets even
with L1.2 enabled all the time?
Yes and yes.
The fact that we drop some packets with dynamic ASPM on the Intel
system means we must be giving up some performance.
And I guess that on the AMD system, we should get full performance but
we must be using a little more power (probably unmeasurable) because
ASPM *could* be always enabled but dynamic ASPM disables it some of
the time.
quoted
And if we actually knew the root cause and could set the correct LTR
values or whatever is wrong on the Intel system, we probably wouldn't
need this dynamic scheme?
Because Realtek already implemented the dynamic ASPM workaround in
their Windows and Linux driver, they never bother to find the root
cause.
So we'll never know what really happens here.
Looks like it. Somebody with a PCIe analyzer could probably make
progress, but I agree, that doesn't seem likely.
Realtek no doubt has the equipment to do this, but apparently they
don't think it's worthwhile. In their defense, the Linux ASPM code is
pretty impenetrable and there could be a problem there that causes or
contributes to this.
Bjorn
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:15:50AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
Introduce a new helper, pcie_aspm_capable(), to report ASPM capability.
The user will be introduced by next patch.
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <redacted>
Change subject to:
PCI/ASPM: Add pcie_aspm_capable()
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
quoted hunk
---
v6:
v5:
- No change.
v4:
- Report aspm_capable instead.
v3:
- This is a new patch
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
@@ -1639,6 +1639,7 @@ int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);voidpcie_no_aspm(void);boolpcie_aspm_support_enabled(void);boolpcie_aspm_enabled(structpci_dev*pdev);+boolpcie_aspm_capable(structpci_dev*pdev);#elsestaticinlineintpci_disable_link_state(structpci_dev*pdev,intstate){return0;}
@@ -1647,6 +1648,7 @@ static inline int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)staticinlinevoidpcie_no_aspm(void){}staticinlineboolpcie_aspm_support_enabled(void){returnfalse;}staticinlineboolpcie_aspm_enabled(structpci_dev*pdev){returnfalse;}+staticinlineboolpcie_aspm_capable(structpci_dev*pdev){returnfalse;}#endif#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:58 PM Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:15:52AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
quoted
r8169 NICs on some platforms have abysmal speed when ASPM is enabled.
Same issue can be observed with older vendor drivers.
The issue is however solved by the latest vendor driver. There's a new
mechanism, which disables r8169's internal ASPM when the NIC traffic has
more than 10 packets per second, and vice versa. The possible reason for
this is likely because the buffer on the chip is too small for its ASPM
exit latency.
...
quoted
quoted
I suppose that on the Intel system, if we enable ASPM, the link goes
to L1.2, and the NIC immediately receives 1000 packets in that second
before we can disable ASPM again, we probably drop a few packets?
Whereas on the AMD system, we probably *never* drop any packets even
with L1.2 enabled all the time?
Yes and yes.
The fact that we drop some packets with dynamic ASPM on the Intel
system means we must be giving up some performance.
And I guess that on the AMD system, we should get full performance but
we must be using a little more power (probably unmeasurable) because
ASPM *could* be always enabled but dynamic ASPM disables it some of
the time.
Yes that's the case here.
quoted
quoted
And if we actually knew the root cause and could set the correct LTR
values or whatever is wrong on the Intel system, we probably wouldn't
need this dynamic scheme?
Because Realtek already implemented the dynamic ASPM workaround in
their Windows and Linux driver, they never bother to find the root
cause.
So we'll never know what really happens here.
Looks like it. Somebody with a PCIe analyzer could probably make
progress, but I agree, that doesn't seem likely.
Realtek no doubt has the equipment to do this, but apparently they
don't think it's worthwhile. In their defense, the Linux ASPM code is
pretty impenetrable and there could be a problem there that causes or
contributes to this.
I do hope they can put more effort on their ethernet driver like what
they do on their wireless drivers.
Kai-Heng