linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

Hi all,

After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c: In function 'gelic_net_setup_netdev':
drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c:1480:26: error: passing argument 2 of 'eth_hw_addr_set' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
 1480 |  eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, &v1);
      |                          ^~~
      |                          |
      |                          u64 * {aka long long unsigned int *}
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c:23:
include/linux/etherdevice.h:309:70: note: expected 'const u8 *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'} but argument is of type 'u64 *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'}
  309 | static inline void eth_hw_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *addr)
      |                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~

Caused by commit

  a96d317fb1a3 ("ethernet: use eth_hw_addr_set()")

I have applied the following patch for today.

From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:19:08 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] ethernet: fix up ps3_gelic_net.c for "ethernet: use
 eth_hw_addr_set()"

Fixes: a96d317fb1a3 ("ethernet: use eth_hw_addr_set()")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
index 1425623b868e..3dbfb1b20649 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c

@@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ int gelic_net_setup_netdev(struct net_device *netdev, struct gelic_card *card)
 			 __func__, status);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, &v1);
+	eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, (u8 *)&v1);
 
 	if (card->vlan_required) {
 		netdev->hard_header_len += VLAN_HLEN;

-- 
2.33.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:23:15 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Applied, thanks. Is this the last one? ;)

I wonder what happened to the kbuild bot :S

Hi Jakub,

On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 18:52:17 -0700 Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

Applied, thanks. Is this the last one? ;)

No idea :-(

I wonder what happened to the kbuild bot :S

Does it do ppc builds?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:43:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 18:52:17 -0700 Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Applied, thanks. Is this the last one? ;)  

No idea :-(

quoted

I wonder what happened to the kbuild bot :S  

Does it do ppc builds?

I thought it did, I get a build status email periodically with a list
of 135 builds. PPC is well represented there.