[PATCH] wireless: ath5k: Remove unnecessary label of ath5k_beacon_update

From: dingsenjie <redacted>

The label just used as return, so we delete it and
use the return statement instead of the goto statement.

Signed-off-by: dingsenjie <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c | 13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
index 4c6e57f..9739189 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c

@@ -1896,23 +1896,18 @@ static int ath5k_remove_padding(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct ath5k_vif *avf;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
-	if (WARN_ON(!vif)) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (WARN_ON(!vif))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	skb = ieee80211_beacon_get(hw, vif);
 
-	if (!skb) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (!skb)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	avf = (void *)vif->drv_priv;
 	ath5k_txbuf_free_skb(ah, avf->bbuf);
 	avf->bbuf->skb = skb;
 	ret = ath5k_beacon_setup(ah, avf->bbuf);
-out:
 	return ret;
 }
 

-- 
1.9.1

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:23:16PM +0800, dingsenjie@163.com wrote:

Just initialize ret = -EINVAL at the top, and you to get clear out a few
braces which are not needed anymore. Anyway, this code is not reflected
on linux-next, what codebase are you using? If the code change is just
a cleanup it should remove more code than add, and a commmit log should
reflect that clearly.

  Luis