[PATCH net-next v2] net: make napi_disable() symmetric with enable
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-09-24 20:25:15
Commit 3765996e4f0b ("napi: fix race inside napi_enable") fixed
an ordering bug in napi_enable() and made the napi_enable() diverge
from napi_disable(). The state transitions done on disable are
not symmetric to enable.
There is no known bug in napi_disable() this is just refactoring.
Eric suggests we can also replace msleep(1) with a more opportunistic
usleep_range().
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 62ddd7d6e00d..fa989ab63f29 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c@@ -6900,19 +6900,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_add); void napi_disable(struct napi_struct *n) { + unsigned long val, new; + might_sleep(); set_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state); - while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state)) - msleep(1); - while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &n->state)) - msleep(1); + do { + val = READ_ONCE(n->state); + if (val & (NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)) { + usleep_range(20, 200); + continue; + } + + new = val | NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC; + new &= ~(NAPIF_STATE_THREADED | NAPIF_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL); + } while (cmpxchg(&n->state, val, new) != val); hrtimer_cancel(&n->timer); - clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, &n->state); clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state); - clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED, &n->state); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(napi_disable);
--
2.31.1