# Re: \[PATCH bpf-next RFC v1 8/8\] bpf, selftests: Add basic test for module kfunc call

- From: Alexei Starovoitov \<hidden\>
- Date: 2021-08-30 20:07:12 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2021/08/7777453
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/bpf/2021/08/7777442/t.md

```text
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:04:24PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c
> index 2cd5cded543f..d3b0adc2a495 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms_module.c
> @@ -4,21 +4,19 @@
>  #include <test_progs.h>
>  #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
>  #include <bpf/btf.h>
> -#include "test_ksyms_module.lskel.h"
> -
> -static int duration;
> +#include "test_ksyms_module.skel.h"

bpf_btf_find_by_name_kind supports searching in modules,
so adding support for kfunc in modules to lskel shouldn't be hard to add.
```