Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb()

Subsystems: networking [general], networking [ipv4/ipv6], the rest

4 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-27 · open the first message on its own page

Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb()

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 01:17:03

Hi Roopa

I noticed inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb() has this endian issue 
when building an UDP header.

Would the following fix break user space ?

Thanks.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index a6f20ee3533554b210d27c4ab6637ca7a05b148b..50133b935f868c2ae9474eea027a0ad864a43936 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -3170,7 +3170,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb(__be32 src, __be32 dst,
                udph = skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr));
                udph->source = sport;
                udph->dest = dport;
-               udph->len = sizeof(struct udphdr);
+               udph->len = htons(sizeof(struct udphdr));
                udph->check = 0;
                break;
        }

Re: Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb()

From: David Ahern <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 04:37:18

On 8/26/21 6:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Hi Roopa

I noticed inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb() has this endian issue 
when building an UDP header.

Would the following fix break user space ?
I do not see how. As I recall this is only for going through
ip_route_input_rcu and ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu and a call to
fib4_rules_early_flow_dissect.
quoted hunk
Thanks.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index a6f20ee3533554b210d27c4ab6637ca7a05b148b..50133b935f868c2ae9474eea027a0ad864a43936 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -3170,7 +3170,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb(__be32 src, __be32 dst,
                udph = skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr));
                udph->source = sport;
                udph->dest = dport;
-               udph->len = sizeof(struct udphdr);
+               udph->len = htons(sizeof(struct udphdr));
                udph->check = 0;
                break;
        }

Re: Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb()

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 15:09:45


On 8/26/21 9:37 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 8/26/21 6:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
Hi Roopa

I noticed inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb() has this endian issue 
when building an UDP header.

Would the following fix break user space ?
I do not see how. As I recall this is only for going through
ip_route_input_rcu and ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu and a call to
fib4_rules_early_flow_dissect.
Ah, nice !

Could we add a test for this feature ?
I could not really figure out reading the commit changelog how this stuff was used.

Re: Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb()

From: David Ahern <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 16:46:12

On 8/27/21 8:09 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:

On 8/26/21 9:37 PM, David Ahern wrote:
quoted
On 8/26/21 6:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
Hi Roopa

I noticed inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb() has this endian issue 
when building an UDP header.

Would the following fix break user space ?
I do not see how. As I recall this is only for going through
ip_route_input_rcu and ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu and a call to
fib4_rules_early_flow_dissect.
Ah, nice !

Could we add a test for this feature ?
I could not really figure out reading the commit changelog how this stuff was used.
tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh

I do not see the udp variant, so yes, those should be added.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help