[PATCH net] net/mlx5: Remove all auxiliary devices at the unregister event

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

The call to mlx5_unregister_device() means that mlx5_core driver is
removed. In such scenario, we need to disregard all other flags like
attach/detach and forcibly remove all auxiliary devices.

Fixes: a5ae8fc9058e ("net/mlx5e: Don't create devices during unload flow")
Tested-and-Reported-by: Yicong Yang [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c
index ff6b03dc7e32..e8093c4e09d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c

@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int mlx5_register_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 void mlx5_unregister_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&mlx5_intf_mutex);
-	dev->priv.flags |= MLX5_PRIV_FLAGS_DISABLE_ALL_ADEV;
+	dev->priv.flags = MLX5_PRIV_FLAGS_DISABLE_ALL_ADEV;
 	mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&mlx5_intf_mutex);
 }

-- 
2.31.1

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

The call to mlx5_unregister_device() means that mlx5_core driver is
removed. In such scenario, we need to disregard all other flags like
attach/detach and forcibly remove all auxiliary devices.

Fixes: a5ae8fc9058e ("net/mlx5e: Don't create devices during unload flow")
Tested-and-Reported-by: Yicong Yang [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Any reason do not apply this patch?

On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:01:22 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

quoted

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

The call to mlx5_unregister_device() means that mlx5_core driver is
removed. In such scenario, we need to disregard all other flags like
attach/detach and forcibly remove all auxiliary devices.

Fixes: a5ae8fc9058e ("net/mlx5e: Don't create devices during unload flow")
Tested-and-Reported-by: Yicong Yang [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)  

Any reason do not apply this patch?

'Awaiting upstream' => we expect Saeed to take it via his tree.
If special handling is requested is should be noted somewhere.

On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 07:18 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:01:22 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

quoted

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

The call to mlx5_unregister_device() means that mlx5_core driver
is
removed. In such scenario, we need to disregard all other flags
like
attach/detach and forcibly remove all auxiliary devices.

Fixes: a5ae8fc9058e ("net/mlx5e: Don't create devices during
unload flow")
Tested-and-Reported-by: Yicong Yang [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)  

Any reason do not apply this patch?

'Awaiting upstream' => we expect Saeed to take it via his tree.
If special handling is requested is should be noted somewhere.

Planned for submission in my next pr.
I don't send net prs until i have enough content, to avoid spamming the
mailing list :).