From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Date: 2021-08-08 22:57:05
These are 2 small improvements brought to the DSA fast ageing changes
merged earlier today.
Patch 1 restores the behavior for DSA drivers that don't implement the
.port_bridge_flags function (I don't think there is any breakage due
to the new behavior, but just to be sure). This came as a result of
Andrew's review.
Patch 2 reduces the number of fast ages of a port from 2 to 1 when it
leaves a bridge.
Vladimir Oltean (2):
net: dsa: still fast-age ports joining a bridge if they can't
configure learning
net: dsa: avoid fast ageing twice when port leaves a bridge
net/dsa/port.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Date: 2021-08-08 22:57:05
Commit 39f32101543b ("net: dsa: don't fast age standalone ports")
assumed that all standalone ports disable address learning, but if the
switch driver implements .port_fast_age but not .port_bridge_flags (like
ksz9477, ksz8795, lantiq_gswip, lan9303), then that might not actually
be true.
So whereas before, the bridge temporarily walking us through the
BLOCKING STP state meant that the standalone ports had a checkpoint to
flush their baggage and start fresh when they join a bridge, after that
commit they no longer do.
Restore the old behavior for these drivers by checking if the switch can
toggle address learning. If it can't, disregard the "do_fast_age"
argument and unconditionally perform fast ageing on STP state changes.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
net/dsa/port.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Date: 2021-08-08 22:57:10
Drivers that support both the toggling of address learning and dynamic
FDB flushing (mv88e6xxx, b53, sja1105) currently need to fast-age a port
twice when it leaves a bridge:
- once, when del_nbp() calls br_stp_disable_port() which puts the port
in the BLOCKING state
- twice, when dsa_port_switchdev_unsync_attrs() calls
dsa_port_clear_brport_flags() which disables address learning
The knee-jerk reaction might be to say "dsa_port_clear_brport_flags does
not need to fast-age the port at all", but the thing is, we still need
both code paths to flush the dynamic FDB entries in different situations.
When a DSA switch port leaves a bonding/team interface that is (still) a
bridge port, no del_nbp() will be called, so we rely on
dsa_port_clear_brport_flags() function to restore proper standalone port
functionality with address learning disabled.
So the solution is just to avoid double the work when both code paths
are called in series. Luckily, DSA already caches the STP port state, so
we can skip flushing the dynamic FDB when we disable address learning
and the STP state is one where no address learning takes place at all.
Under that condition, not flushing the FDB is safe because there is
supposed to not be any dynamic FDB entry at all (they were flushed
during the transition towards that state, and none were learned in the
meanwhile).
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
net/dsa/port.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 01:56:47 +0300 you wrote:
These are 2 small improvements brought to the DSA fast ageing changes
merged earlier today.
Patch 1 restores the behavior for DSA drivers that don't implement the
.port_bridge_flags function (I don't think there is any breakage due
to the new behavior, but just to be sure). This came as a result of
Andrew's review.
[...]