--- Load the BTF specified by btf_custom_path to btf_vmlinux_override
instead of btf_bmlinux.
--- Fix the memory leak that may be introduced by the second version
of the patch.
--- Add a new patch to fix the possible memory leak caused by
obj->kconfig.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaGjEC4t1OefDo11pj2-HfNy0BLhs_G2UREjRNTmb2u=A@mail.gmail.com/t/#m4d9f7c6761fbd2b436b5dfe491cd864b70225804
v1->v2:
-- Change custom_btf_path to btf_custom_path.
-- If the length of btf_custom_path of bpf_obj_open_opts is too long,
return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG).
-- Add `custom BTF is in addition to vmlinux BTF`
with btf_custom_path field.
Shuyi Cheng (2):
libbpf: Introduce 'btf_custom_path' to 'bpf_obj_open_opts'
libbpf: Fix the possible memory leak caused by obj->kconfig
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
btf_custom_path allows developers to load custom BTF, and subsequent
CO-RE will use custom BTF for relocation.
Learn from Andrii's comments in [0], add the btf_custom_path parameter
to bpf_obj_open_opts, you can directly use the skeleton's
<objname>_bpf__open_opts function to pass in the btf_custom_path
parameter.
Prior to this, there was also a developer who provided a patch with
similar functions. It is a pity that the follow-up did not continue to
advance. See [1].
[0]https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzbJZLjNoiK8_VfeVg_Vrg=9iYFv+po-38SMe=UzwDKJ=Q@mail.gmail.com/#t
[1]https://yhbt.net/lore/all/CAEf4Bzbgw49w2PtowsrzKQNcxD4fZRE6AKByX-5-dMo-+oWHHA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Shuyi Cheng <redacted>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -8049,6 +8087,7 @@ int bpf_object__load_xattr(struct bpf_object_load_attr *attr)bpf_gen__init(obj->gen_loader,attr->log_level);err=bpf_object__probe_loading(obj);+err=err?:bpf_object__load_override_btf(obj);err=err?:bpf_object__load_vmlinux_btf(obj,false);err=err?:bpf_object__resolve_externs(obj,obj->kconfig);err=err?:bpf_object__sanitize_and_load_btf(obj);
@@ -8075,9 +8114,11 @@ int bpf_object__load_xattr(struct bpf_object_load_attr *attr)}free(obj->btf_modules);-/* clean up vmlinux BTF */+/* clean up vmlinux BTF and custom BTF*/btf__free(obj->btf_vmlinux);obj->btf_vmlinux=NULL;+btf__free(obj->btf_vmlinux_override);+obj->btf_vmlinux_override=NULL;obj->loaded=true;/* doesn't matter if successfully or not */
@@ -94,8 +94,12 @@ struct bpf_object_open_opts {*systemKconfigforCONFIG_xxxexterns.*/constchar*kconfig;+/* custom BTF is in addition to vmlinux BTF (i.e., Use the CO-RE+*featureintheoldkernel).+*/+char*btf_custom_path;};-#define bpf_object_open_opts__last_field kconfig+#define bpf_object_open_opts__last_field btf_custom_pathLIBBPF_APIstructbpf_object*bpf_object__open(constchar*path);LIBBPF_APIstructbpf_object*
When obj->kconfig is NULL, ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) should not be returned
directly, err=-ENOMEM should be set, and then goto out.
Signed-off-by: Shuyi Cheng <redacted>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden> Date: 2021-07-10 14:44:00
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 10:47:53AM +0800, Shuyi Cheng wrote:
When obj->kconfig is NULL, ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) should not be returned
directly, err=-ENOMEM should be set, and then goto out.
The commit message needs to say what the problem is that the patch is
fixing. Here is a better commit message:
[PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] libbpf: Fix the possible memory leak on error
If the strdup() fails then we need to call bpf_object__close(obj) to
avoid a resource leak.
Add a Fixes tag as well.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 10:47:53AM +0800, Shuyi Cheng wrote:
quoted
When obj->kconfig is NULL, ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) should not be returned
directly, err=-ENOMEM should be set, and then goto out.
The commit message needs to say what the problem is that the patch is
fixing. Here is a better commit message:
[PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] libbpf: Fix the possible memory leak on error
If the strdup() fails then we need to call bpf_object__close(obj) to
avoid a resource leak.
Add a Fixes tag as well.
Agree, Thanks.
After Andrii reviews the patch, I will resend a new patch.
regards,
Shuyi
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 7:48 PM Shuyi Cheng [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
btf_custom_path allows developers to load custom BTF, and subsequent
CO-RE will use custom BTF for relocation.
Learn from Andrii's comments in [0], add the btf_custom_path parameter
to bpf_obj_open_opts, you can directly use the skeleton's
<objname>_bpf__open_opts function to pass in the btf_custom_path
parameter.
Prior to this, there was also a developer who provided a patch with
similar functions. It is a pity that the follow-up did not continue to
advance. See [1].
[0]https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzbJZLjNoiK8_VfeVg_Vrg=9iYFv+po-38SMe=UzwDKJ=Q@mail.gmail.com/#t
[1]https://yhbt.net/lore/all/CAEf4Bzbgw49w2PtowsrzKQNcxD4fZRE6AKByX-5-dMo-+oWHHA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Shuyi Cheng <redacted>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -498,6 +498,10 @@ struct bpf_object {*itatloadtime.*/structbtf*btf_vmlinux;+/* custom BTF is in addition to vmlinux BTF (i.e., Use the CO-RE+*featureintheoldkernel).+*/
nit: "path to custom BTF used for CO-RE relocations" as a description?
btf_vmlinux_override is already working properly, so all you need to
do here (once you remembered btf_custom_path) is to pass it to
bpf_object__relocate. All the rest is taken care of, so you don't need
to add extra cleanup (except for zfree(btf_custom_path)).
so few lines below this code, after bpf_object__create_maps(obj):
err = err ? : bpf_object__relocate(obj, obj->btf_custom_path ?:
attr->target_btf_path);
This way open_opts->btf_custom_path serves as an override for
load_attr's target_btf_path (which we are going to deprecate anyways).
The only remaining thing is to make sure that
bpf_object__load_vmlinux_btf() won't attempt to load real vmlinux BTF
*just for CO-RE*. So in obj_needs_vmlinux_btf() make sure to not
return true for CO-RE relocations if custom_btf_path is specified (see
Vamsi's patch which has this logic already).
quoted hunk
@@ -8075,9 +8114,11 @@ int bpf_object__load_xattr(struct bpf_object_load_attr *attr) } free(obj->btf_modules);- /* clean up vmlinux BTF */+ /* clean up vmlinux BTF and custom BTF*/ btf__free(obj->btf_vmlinux); obj->btf_vmlinux = NULL;+ btf__free(obj->btf_vmlinux_override);+ obj->btf_vmlinux_override = NULL;
this shouldn't be necessary, bpf_object__relocate_core() handled this
quoted hunk
obj->loaded = true; /* doesn't matter if successfully or not */
@@ -8702,6 +8743,7 @@ void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj) for (i = 0; i < obj->nr_maps; i++) bpf_map__destroy(&obj->maps[i]);+ zfree(&obj->btf_custom_path); zfree(&obj->kconfig); zfree(&obj->externs); obj->nr_extern = 0;
@@ -94,8 +94,12 @@ struct bpf_object_open_opts {*systemKconfigforCONFIG_xxxexterns.*/constchar*kconfig;+/* custom BTF is in addition to vmlinux BTF (i.e., Use the CO-RE+*featureintheoldkernel).
Instead of "Use the CO-RE feature in the old kernel", let's point out
explicitly that this custom BTF is used *only* for CO-RE, and any
other feature that relies on kernel BTF will still need actual vmlinux
BTF. Something like this:
/* Path to the custom BTF to be used for BPF CO-RE relocations.
* This custom BTF completely replaces the use of vmlinux BTF
* for the purpose of CO-RE relocations.
* NOTE: any other BPF feature (e.g., fentry/fexit programs,
* struct_ops, etc) will need actual kernel BTF at /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux.
*/
I think this will make it much clearer what's the intended purpose here.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 7:48 PM Shuyi Cheng [off-list ref] wrote:
Patch 1: Add 'btf_custom_path' to 'bpf_obj_open_opts', allow developers
to use custom btf to perform CO-RE relocation.
Patch 2: Fixed the memory leak problem pointed out by Andrii.
Please note that the cover letter should have a high-level overview of
what the set of patches you are sending is doing, not just a
changelog. So in this case, as an example for the future
contributions, I'd write something like this:
BTW, see the description above about selftests (fictional patch #3).
Please update selftests core_autosize.c and core_reloc.c to use the
new functionality instead of load_attr.target_btf_path. It's a general
rule to always add a new test or update existing test to utilize newly
added functionality. That way we can know that it actually works as
expected.
--- Load the BTF specified by btf_custom_path to btf_vmlinux_override
instead of btf_bmlinux.
--- Fix the memory leak that may be introduced by the second version
of the patch.
--- Add a new patch to fix the possible memory leak caused by
obj->kconfig.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaGjEC4t1OefDo11pj2-HfNy0BLhs_G2UREjRNTmb2u=A@mail.gmail.com/t/#m4d9f7c6761fbd2b436b5dfe491cd864b70225804
v1->v2:
-- Change custom_btf_path to btf_custom_path.
-- If the length of btf_custom_path of bpf_obj_open_opts is too long,
return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG).
-- Add `custom BTF is in addition to vmlinux BTF`
with btf_custom_path field.
Shuyi Cheng (2):
libbpf: Introduce 'btf_custom_path' to 'bpf_obj_open_opts'
libbpf: Fix the possible memory leak caused by obj->kconfig
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1