[PATCH net] ixgbe: xsk: fix for metasize when...

[PATCH net] ixgbe: xsk: fix for metasize when construct skb by xdp_buff

From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2021-06-09 12:22:48

We should copy data_meta to the skb space.  Then use __skb_pull to
correct skb->data

Fixes: d0bcacd0a1309 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Rx support")
Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
index f72d2978263b..ee88107fa57a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c

@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbe_construct_skb_zc(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
 					      struct ixgbe_rx_buffer *bi)
 {
 	unsigned int metasize = bi->xdp->data - bi->xdp->data_meta;
-	unsigned int datasize = bi->xdp->data_end - bi->xdp->data;
+	unsigned int datasize = bi->xdp->data_end - bi->xdp->data_meta;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	/* allocate a skb to store the frags */

@@ -214,10 +214,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbe_construct_skb_zc(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
-	skb_reserve(skb, bi->xdp->data - bi->xdp->data_hard_start);
-	memcpy(__skb_put(skb, datasize), bi->xdp->data, datasize);
-	if (metasize)
+	skb_reserve(skb, bi->xdp->data_meta - bi->xdp->data_hard_start);
+	memcpy(__skb_put(skb, datasize), bi->xdp->data_meta, datasize);
+	if (metasize) {
+		__skb_pull(skb, metasize);
 		skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
+	}
 
 	xsk_buff_free(bi->xdp);
 	bi->xdp = NULL;

-- 
2.31.0

Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: xsk: fix for metasize when construct skb by xdp_buff

From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Date: 2021-06-11 15:25:34

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:22:44PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:

We should copy data_meta to the skb space.  Then use __skb_pull to
correct skb->data

This looks like a bug that has been sitting over here for sometime. Have
you encountered this during your virtio-net's AF_XDP ZC work? I'm all ears
how you spotted this.

Anyway, other drivers needs such fixing too. Are you willing to do that or
should we take it on our side?

Magnus is OOO today, I'd like to get his final ack on that.

From me:
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

Thanks!

quoted hunk

Fixes: d0bcacd0a1309 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Rx support")
Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
index f72d2978263b..ee88107fa57a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c

@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbe_construct_skb_zc(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
 					      struct ixgbe_rx_buffer *bi)
 {
 	unsigned int metasize = bi->xdp->data - bi->xdp->data_meta;
-	unsigned int datasize = bi->xdp->data_end - bi->xdp->data;
+	unsigned int datasize = bi->xdp->data_end - bi->xdp->data_meta;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	/* allocate a skb to store the frags */

@@ -214,10 +214,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbe_construct_skb_zc(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
-	skb_reserve(skb, bi->xdp->data - bi->xdp->data_hard_start);
-	memcpy(__skb_put(skb, datasize), bi->xdp->data, datasize);
-	if (metasize)
+	skb_reserve(skb, bi->xdp->data_meta - bi->xdp->data_hard_start);
+	memcpy(__skb_put(skb, datasize), bi->xdp->data_meta, datasize);
+	if (metasize) {
+		__skb_pull(skb, metasize);
 		skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
+	}
 
 	xsk_buff_free(bi->xdp);
 	bi->xdp = NULL;

-- 
2.31.0

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help