[PATCH net-next] l2tp: Fix spelling mistakes
From: Zheng Yongjun <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-07 14:48:07
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: negociated ==> negotiated dont ==> don't Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <redacted> --- net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c | 2 +- net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c
index 97ae1255fcb6..60aa990ea72e 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int l2tp_ip_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) } } - /* We dont need to clone dst here, it is guaranteed to not disappear. + /* We don't need to clone dst here, it is guaranteed to not disappear. * __dev_xmit_skb() might force a refcount if needed. */ skb_dst_set_noref(skb, &rt->dst);
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
index aea85f91f059..bf35710127dd 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static void pppol2tp_recv(struct l2tp_session *session, struct sk_buff *skb, int /* If the first two bytes are 0xFF03, consider that it is the PPP's * Address and Control fields and skip them. The L2TP module has always * worked this way, although, in theory, the use of these fields should - * be negociated and handled at the PPP layer. These fields are + * be negotiated and handled at the PPP layer. These fields are * constant: 0xFF is the All-Stations Address and 0x03 the Unnumbered * Information command with Poll/Final bit set to zero (RFC 1662). */
--
2.25.1