[PATCH net] vxlan: add missing rcu_read_lock() in neigh_reduce()

Subsystems: networking drivers, the rest

STALE1898d

4 messages, 4 authors, 2021-06-22 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net] vxlan: add missing rcu_read_lock() in neigh_reduce()

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-21 14:44:25

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

syzbot complained in neigh_reduce(), because rcu_read_lock_bh()
is treated differently than rcu_read_lock()

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------
include/net/addrconf.h:313 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
3 locks held by kworker/0:0/5:
 #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic64_set include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:856 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:617 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:644 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x871/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
 #1: ffffc90000ca7da8 ((work_completion)(&port->wq)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8a5/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2251
 #2: ffffffff8bf795c0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1da/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4180

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: events ipvlan_process_multicast
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:313 [inline]
 __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:311 [inline]
 neigh_reduce drivers/net/vxlan.c:2167 [inline]
 vxlan_xmit+0x34d5/0x4c30 drivers/net/vxlan.c:2919
 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4944 [inline]
 netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4958 [inline]
 xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3654 [inline]
 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1eb/0x920 net/core/dev.c:3670
 __dev_queue_xmit+0x2133/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4246
 ipvlan_process_multicast+0xa99/0xd70 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:287
 process_one_work+0x98d/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
 kthread+0x3b1/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:313
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

Fixes: f564f45c4518 ("vxlan: add ipv6 proxy support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 02a14f1b938ad50fc28044b7670ba5f6bf924345..5a8df5a195cb5700c45b4785355ef8ed84866052 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2164,6 +2164,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
 	struct neighbour *n;
 	struct nd_msg *msg;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	in6_dev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
 	if (!in6_dev)
 		goto out;
@@ -2215,6 +2216,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
 	}
 
 out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	consume_skb(skb);
 	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 }
-- 
2.32.0.288.g62a8d224e6-goog

Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: add missing rcu_read_lock() in neigh_reduce()

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2021-06-21 16:04:53

On 6/21/21 4:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

syzbot complained in neigh_reduce(), because rcu_read_lock_bh()
is treated differently than rcu_read_lock()

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------
include/net/addrconf.h:313 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
3 locks held by kworker/0:0/5:
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic64_set include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:856 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:617 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:644 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x871/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
  #1: ffffc90000ca7da8 ((work_completion)(&port->wq)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8a5/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2251
  #2: ffffffff8bf795c0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1da/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4180

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: events ipvlan_process_multicast
Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
  __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:313 [inline]
  __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:311 [inline]
  neigh_reduce drivers/net/vxlan.c:2167 [inline]
  vxlan_xmit+0x34d5/0x4c30 drivers/net/vxlan.c:2919
  __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4944 [inline]
  netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4958 [inline]
  xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3654 [inline]
  dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1eb/0x920 net/core/dev.c:3670
  __dev_queue_xmit+0x2133/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4246
  ipvlan_process_multicast+0xa99/0xd70 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:287
  process_one_work+0x98d/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
  worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
  kthread+0x3b1/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:313
  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

Fixes: f564f45c4518 ("vxlan: add ipv6 proxy support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
[ +Paul/Toke ]

Only a side comment on this fix given the series under [0] where we remove the
rcu_read_lock() given covered by rcu_read_lock_bh():

   [...] It seems [1] that back in the early days of XDP, local_bh_disable() did
   not provide RCU protection, which is why the rcu_read_lock() calls were added
   to drivers in the first place. But according to Paul [2], in recent kernels
   a local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() pair functions as one big RCU
   read-side section, so no further protection is needed. This even applies to
   -rt kernels, which has an explicit rcu_read_lock() in place as part of the
   local_bh_disable() [3]. [...]

Paul/Toke, with regards to related questions under [1], I presume there should
additionally be a fixup for lockdep /in general/ to silence warning like these ?

   [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210617212748.32456-1-toke@redhat.com/
   [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1881ecbe-06ec-6b0a-836c-033c31fabef4@iogearbox.net/
quoted hunk
---
  drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 02a14f1b938ad50fc28044b7670ba5f6bf924345..5a8df5a195cb5700c45b4785355ef8ed84866052 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2164,6 +2164,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
  	struct neighbour *n;
  	struct nd_msg *msg;
  
+	rcu_read_lock();
  	in6_dev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
  	if (!in6_dev)
  		goto out;
@@ -2215,6 +2216,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
  	}
  
  out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
  	consume_skb(skb);
  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
  }

Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: add missing rcu_read_lock() in neigh_reduce()

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-21 18:27:16

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 06:04:46PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 6/21/21 4:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

syzbot complained in neigh_reduce(), because rcu_read_lock_bh()
is treated differently than rcu_read_lock()

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------
include/net/addrconf.h:313 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
This "debug_locks = 1" often indicates that there was some other lockdep
complaint that happened at about the same time.
quoted
3 locks held by kworker/0:0/5:
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic64_set include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:856 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:617 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:644 [inline]
  #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x871/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
  #1: ffffc90000ca7da8 ((work_completion)(&port->wq)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8a5/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2251
  #2: ffffffff8bf795c0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1da/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4180

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: events ipvlan_process_multicast
Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
  __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:313 [inline]
  __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:311 [inline]
  neigh_reduce drivers/net/vxlan.c:2167 [inline]
  vxlan_xmit+0x34d5/0x4c30 drivers/net/vxlan.c:2919
  __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4944 [inline]
  netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4958 [inline]
  xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3654 [inline]
  dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1eb/0x920 net/core/dev.c:3670
  __dev_queue_xmit+0x2133/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4246
  ipvlan_process_multicast+0xa99/0xd70 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:287
  process_one_work+0x98d/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
  worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
  kthread+0x3b1/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:313
  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

Fixes: f564f45c4518 ("vxlan: add ipv6 proxy support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
[ +Paul/Toke ]

Only a side comment on this fix given the series under [0] where we remove the
rcu_read_lock() given covered by rcu_read_lock_bh():

  [...] It seems [1] that back in the early days of XDP, local_bh_disable() did
  not provide RCU protection, which is why the rcu_read_lock() calls were added
  to drivers in the first place. But according to Paul [2], in recent kernels
  a local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() pair functions as one big RCU
  read-side section, so no further protection is needed. This even applies to
  -rt kernels, which has an explicit rcu_read_lock() in place as part of the
  local_bh_disable() [3]. [...]

Paul/Toke, with regards to related questions under [1], I presume there should
additionally be a fixup for lockdep /in general/ to silence warning like these ?
Do these commits help?

1feb2cc8db48 ("lockdep: Explicitly flag likely false-positive report")
3066820034b5 ("rcu: Reject RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() false positives")

With a bit of luck, these will go into the upcoming merge window.

							Thanx, Paul
  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210617212748.32456-1-toke@redhat.com/
  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1881ecbe-06ec-6b0a-836c-033c31fabef4@iogearbox.net/
quoted
---
  drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index 02a14f1b938ad50fc28044b7670ba5f6bf924345..5a8df5a195cb5700c45b4785355ef8ed84866052 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -2164,6 +2164,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
  	struct neighbour *n;
  	struct nd_msg *msg;
+	rcu_read_lock();
  	in6_dev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
  	if (!in6_dev)
  		goto out;
@@ -2215,6 +2216,7 @@ static int neigh_reduce(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
  	}
  out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
  	consume_skb(skb);
  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
  }

Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: add missing rcu_read_lock() in neigh_reduce()

From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2021-06-22 16:50:05

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:44:17 -0700 you wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

syzbot complained in neigh_reduce(), because rcu_read_lock_bh()
is treated differently than rcu_read_lock()

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted

[...]
Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] vxlan: add missing rcu_read_lock() in neigh_reduce()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/85e8b032d6eb

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help