Hello,
At work, we have spent a great deal of work on a situation which ended
up being resolved by changing the net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time sysctl to
a value much lower than the default (we set it to 300). This was two
Linux-based systems communicating without any firewalls in-between,
where some long-running connections would be considered down by one
system, while the other expected them to still be around.
The following is the description of the setting:
"The interval between the last data packet sent (simple ACKs are not
considered data) and the first keepalive probe; after the connection is
marked to need keepalive, this counter is not used any further."
The default value of net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time sysctl is 7200 seconds,
i.e. two hours.
It seems odd to me to still have such a long period of waiting, before
keep-alive kicks in. With such a long initial wait, it's questionable
how much value the keep-alive functionality has, I think.
Could it be that it's time to change the default? I would suggest a
value of 10 minutes, i.e. 600 seconds, but I have to admit, that I don't
have any objective argument for exactly that value.
--
Regards,
Troels Arvin
Hello,
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:00:04AM +0200, Troels Arvin wrote:
Hello,
At work, we have spent a great deal of work on a situation which ended up
being resolved by changing the net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time sysctl to a value
much lower than the default (we set it to 300). This was two Linux-based
systems communicating without any firewalls in-between, where some
long-running connections would be considered down by one system, while the
other expected them to still be around.
The following is the description of the setting:
"The interval between the last data packet sent (simple ACKs are not
considered data) and the first keepalive probe; after the connection is
marked to need keepalive, this counter is not used any further."
The default value of net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time sysctl is 7200 seconds,
i.e. two hours.
It seems odd to me to still have such a long period of waiting, before
keep-alive kicks in. With such a long initial wait, it's questionable how
much value the keep-alive functionality has, I think.
Could it be that it's time to change the default? I would suggest a value of
10 minutes, i.e. 600 seconds, but I have to admit, that I don't have any
objective argument for exactly that value.
There is no good value, it's entirely dependent on the application. At
least with a large default value you have little risk to flood your
links when dealing with hundreds of thousands to millions of idle
connections (think WebSocket for example). A 10 minute value would
still be too large for plenty of users but cause excessive traffic
for others.
I strongly suggest that the value must be tunable in the application
instead, that's the only way to get it right for everyone (see
TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPINTVL and TCP_KEEPIDLE).
Just my two cents,
Willy