Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 8 authors, 2021-04-29

Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros accept a format specifier

From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: 2021-04-22 17:12:41
Also in: kernel-janitors, linux-rdma, lkml

On 4/22/21 5:24 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:02:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
quoted
On 4/18/21 11:36 PM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote:
quoted
The list in To: is the one given by get_maintainer.pl. Usualy, I only
put the ML in Cc: I've run the script on the 2 patches of the serie
and merged the 2 lists. Everyone is in the To: of the cover letter
and of the 2 patches.

If Théo is "Tejun Heo" (  (maintainer:WORKQUEUE) ), he is already in
the To: line.
Linus wants to see a "Cc: ${maintainer}" tag in patches that he receives
from a maintainer and that modify another subsystem than the subsystem
maintained by that maintainer.
Really? Do you remember a lore link for this?
Last time I saw Linus mentioning this was a few months ago.
Unfortunately I cannot find that message anymore.
Generally I've been junking the CC lines (vs Andrew at the other
extreme that often has 10's of CC lines)
Most entries in the MAINTAINERS file have one to three email addresses
so I'm surprised to read that Cc-ing maintainer(s) could result in tens
of Cc lines?

Thanks,

Bart.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help