[PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix bail out from 'ringbuf_process_ring()' on error

The current code bails out with negative and positive returns.
If the callback returns a positive return code, 'ring_buffer__consume()'
and 'ring_buffer__poll()' will return a spurious number of records
consumed, but mostly important will continue the processing loop.

This patch makes positive returns from the callback a no-op.

Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <redacted>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
index 8caaafe7e312..e7a8d847161f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c

@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring* r)
 			if ((len & BPF_RINGBUF_DISCARD_BIT) == 0) {
 				sample = (void *)len_ptr + BPF_RINGBUF_HDR_SZ;
 				err = r->sample_cb(r->ctx, sample, len);
-				if (err) {
+				if (err < 0) {
 					/* update consumer pos and bail out */
 					smp_store_release(r->consumer_pos,
 							  cons_pos);

-- 
2.25.1

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 8:02 AM Pedro Tammela [off-list ref] wrote:

The current code bails out with negative and positive returns.
If the callback returns a positive return code, 'ring_buffer__consume()'
and 'ring_buffer__poll()' will return a spurious number of records
consumed, but mostly important will continue the processing loop.

This patch makes positive returns from the callback a no-op.

Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <redacted>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Thanks. Applied to bpf tree and added:

Fixes: bf99c936f947 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support")