vhost_reset_is_le() is vhost_init_is_le(), and in the case of
cross-endian legacy, vhost_init_is_le() depends on vq->user_be.
vq->user_be is set by vhost_disable_cross_endian().
But in vhost_vq_reset(), we have:
vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq);
And so user_be is used before being set.
To fix that, reverse the lines order as there is no other dependency
between them.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Jason Wang <hidden> Date: 2021-03-15 08:32:28
在 2021/3/12 下午10:09, Laurent Vivier 写道:
vhost_reset_is_le() is vhost_init_is_le(), and in the case of
cross-endian legacy, vhost_init_is_le() depends on vq->user_be.
vq->user_be is set by vhost_disable_cross_endian().
But in vhost_vq_reset(), we have:
vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq);
And so user_be is used before being set.
To fix that, reverse the lines order as there is no other dependency
between them.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:09:13PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
vhost_reset_is_le() is vhost_init_is_le(), and in the case of
cross-endian legacy, vhost_init_is_le() depends on vq->user_be.
vq->user_be is set by vhost_disable_cross_endian().
But in vhost_vq_reset(), we have:
vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq);
And so user_be is used before being set.
To fix that, reverse the lines order as there is no other dependency
between them.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)