From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden> Date: 2021-03-11 00:48:30
Hi all,
After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed
like this:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'libbpf_util.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/staticobjs/xsk.o'. Stop.
Caused by commit
7e8bbe24cb8b ("libbpf: xsk: Move barriers from libbpf_util.h to xsk.h")
I have used the bpf tree from next-20210310 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
From: Björn Töpel <hidden> Date: 2021-03-11 06:47:49
On 2021-03-11 01:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed
like this:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'libbpf_util.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/staticobjs/xsk.o'. Stop.
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden> Date: 2021-03-12 01:01:03
Hi Björn,
[Cc'ing a few (maybe) interested parties]
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:47:03 +0100 Björn Töpel [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2021-03-11 01:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed
like this:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'libbpf_util.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/staticobjs/xsk.o'. Stop.
It's an incremental build issue, as pointed out here [1], that is
resolved by cleaning the build.
Does this mean there is a deficiency in the dependencies in our build system?
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden> Date: 2021-03-26 01:19:16
Hi all,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:00:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
[Cc'ing a few (maybe) interested parties]
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:47:03 +0100 Björn Töpel [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 2021-03-11 01:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed
like this:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'libbpf_util.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/staticobjs/xsk.o'. Stop.
It's an incremental build issue, as pointed out here [1], that is
resolved by cleaning the build.
Does this mean there is a deficiency in the dependencies in our build system?