From: Junlin Yang <redacted>
ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
there is no need for the second irqsave,since interrupts are disabled
at that point, so remove the second irqsave:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18:
ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404.
Signed-off-by: Junlin Yang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Junlin Yang <redacted>
ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
there is no need for the second irqsave,since interrupts are disabled
at that point, so remove the second irqsave:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18:
ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404.
Thanks. Please add
Fixes: 4a41c421f367 ("ibmvnic: serialize access to work queue on remove")
From: Junlin Yang <redacted>
ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
there is no need for the second irqsave,since interrupts are disabled
at that point, so remove the second irqsave:
The problème is not that there is no need. The problem is a lot more serious:
As reported by coccinella, the second _irqsave() overwrites the value saved in 'flags' by the first
_irqsave, therefore when the second _irqrestore comes, the value in 'flags' is not valid, the value
saved by the first _irqsave has been lost. This likely leads to IRQs remaining disabled, which is
_THE_ problem really.
quoted hunk
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18:
ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404.
Signed-off-by: Junlin Yang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Lijun Pan <hidden> Date: 2021-03-05 06:05:06
On Mar 4, 2021, at 11:49 PM, Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:
Le 05/03/2021 à 02:43, angkery a écrit :
quoted
From: Junlin Yang <redacted>
ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
there is no need for the second irqsave,since interrupts are disabled
at that point, so remove the second irqsave:
The problème is not that there is no need. The problem is a lot more serious:
As reported by coccinella, the second _irqsave() overwrites the value saved in 'flags' by the first _irqsave, therefore when the second _irqrestore comes, the value in 'flags' is not valid, the value saved by the first _irqsave has been lost. This likely leads to IRQs remaining disabled, which is _THE_ problem really.
That does sounds like a more serious functional problem than coccinella check.
Thanks for your explanation.
quoted
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18:
ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404.
Signed-off-by: Junlin Yang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 06:49:14 +0100
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:
Le 05/03/2021 à 02:43, angkery a écrit :
quoted
From: Junlin Yang <redacted>
ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
there is no need for the second irqsave,since interrupts are
disabled at that point, so remove the second irqsave:
The problème is not that there is no need. The problem is a lot more
serious: As reported by coccinella, the second _irqsave() overwrites
the value saved in 'flags' by the first _irqsave, therefore when the
second _irqrestore comes, the value in 'flags' is not valid, the
value saved by the first _irqsave has been lost. This likely leads to
IRQs remaining disabled, which is _THE_ problem really.
Thank you for explaining the real problem.
I will update the commit information with your description.
quoted
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18:
ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404.
Signed-off-by: Junlin Yang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c index 2464c8a..a52668d 100644
*dev)
* after setting state, so __ibmvnic_reset() which is
called
* from the flush_work() below, can make progress.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
adapter->state = VNIC_REMOVING;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);