Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-03-01 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-01 11:04:21

Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
quoted
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
quoted
Shuah Khan (3):
  lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
  lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
  ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls
Thanks!
Via which tree should these go?
I've just queued the lot for locking/core, which will show up in tip
when the robots don't hate on it.

Does that work for you?
That's perfect, thanks! Just making sure that the patches don't get
lost.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()

From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-03-01 16:11:17

On 3/1/21 4:02 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
quoted
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
quoted
Shuah Khan (3):
   lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
   lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
   ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls
Thanks!
Via which tree should these go?
I've just queued the lot for locking/core, which will show up in tip
when the robots don't hate on it.

Does that work for you?
That's perfect, thanks! Just making sure that the patches don't get
lost.
Awesome. Thank you.

thanks,
-- Shuah
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help