From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-14 16:49:14
The popular utility ping has several severe limitations, such as the
inability to query specific interfaces on a node and requiring
bidirectional connectivity between the probing and probed interfaces.
RFC 8335 attempts to solve these limitations by creating the new utility
PROBE which is a specialized ICMP message that makes use of the ICMP
Extension Structure outlined in RFC 4884.
This patchset adds definitions for the ICMP Extended Echo Request and
Reply (PROBE) types for both IPV4 and IPV6, adds a sysctl to enable
responses to PROBE messages, expands the list of supported ICMP messages
to accommodate PROBE types, and adds functionality to respond to PROBE
requests.
Changes:
v1 -> v2:
- Add AFI definitions
- Switch to functions such as dev_get_by_name and ip_dev_find to lookup
net devices
v2 -> v3:
Suggested by Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref]
- Add verification of incoming messages before looking up netdev
- Add prefix for PROBE specific defined variables
- Use proc_dointvec_minmax with zero and one for sysctl
- Create struct icmp_ext_echo_iio for parsing incoming packets
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
- Include net/addrconf.h library for ipv6_dev_find
v3 -> v4:
- Use in_addr instead of __be32 for storing IPV4 addresses
- Use IFNAMSIZ to statically allocate space for name in
icmp_ext_echo_iio
Suggested by Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref]
- Use skb_header_pointer to verify fields in incoming message
- Add check to ensure that extobj_hdr.length is valid
- Check to ensure object payload is padded with ASCII NULL characters
when probing by name, as specified by RFC 8335
- Statically allocate buff using IFNAMSIZ
- Add rcu blocking around ipv6_dev_find
- Use __in_dev_get_rcu to access IPV4 addresses of identified
net_device
- Remove check for ICMPV6 PROBE types
Andreas Roeseler (5):
icmp: add support for RFC 8335 PROBE
ICMPV6: add support for RFC 8335 PROBE
net: add sysctl for enabling RFC 8335 PROBE messages
net: add support for sending RFC 8335 PROBE messages
icmp: add response to RFC 8335 PROBE messages
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/icmp.h | 42 +++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h | 3 +
net/ipv4/icmp.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
net/ipv4/ping.c | 4 +-
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 9 +++
6 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-14 16:49:14
Add definitions for PROBE ICMP types and codes.
Add AFI definitions for IP and IPV6 as specified by IANA
Add a struct to represent the additional header when probing by IP
address (ctype == 3) for use in parsing incoming PROBE messages
Add a struct to represent the entire Interface Identification Object
(IIO) section of an incoming PROBE packet
Signed-off-by: Andreas Roeseler <redacted>
---
Changes:
v1 -> v2:
- Add AFI_IP and AFI_IP6 definitions
v2 -> v3:
Suggested by Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref]
- Add prefix for PROBE specific defined variables
- Create struct icmp_ext_echo_iio for parsing incoming packet
v3 -> v4:
- Use in_addr instead of __be32 for storing IPV4 addresses
- Use IFNAMSIZ to statically allocate space for name in
icmp_ext_echo_iio
---
include/uapi/linux/icmp.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-14 16:49:15
Add definitions for the ICMPV6 type of Extended Echo Request and
Extended Echo Reply, as defined by sections 2 and 3 of RFC 8335.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Roeseler <redacted>
---
include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-14 16:49:15
Section 8 of RFC 8335 specifies potential security concerns of
responding to PROBE requests, and states that nodes that support PROBE
functionality MUST be able to enable/disable responses and that
responses MUST be disabled by default
Signed-off-by: Andreas Roeseler <redacted>
---
Changes:
v1 -> v2:
- Combine patches related to sysctl
v2 -> v3:
Suggested by Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref]
- Use proc_dointvec_minmax with zero and one
---
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-14 16:49:45
Modify the ping_supported function to support PROBE message types. This
allows tools such as the ping command in the iputils package to be
modified to send PROBE requests through the existing framework for
sending ping requests.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Roeseler <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/ping.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-14 16:49:45
Modify the icmp_rcv function to check PROBE messages and call icmp_echo
if a PROBE request is detected.
Modify the existing icmp_echo function to respond ot both ping and PROBE
requests.
This was tested using a custom modification to the iputils package and
wireshark. It supports IPV4 probing by name, ifindex, and probing by
both IPV4 and IPV6 addresses. It currently does not support responding
to probes off the proxy node (see RFC 8335 Section 2).
Signed-off-by: Andreas Roeseler <redacted>
---
Changes:
v1 -> v2:
- Reorder variable declarations to follow coding style
- Switch to functions such as dev_get_by_name and ip_dev_find to lookup
net devices
v2 -> v3:
Suggested by Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref]
- Add verification of incoming messages before looking up netdev
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
- Include net/addrconf.h library for ipv6_dev_find
v3 -> v4:
Suggested by Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref]
- Use skb_header_pointer to verify fields in incoming message
- Add check to ensure that extobj_hdr.length is valid
- Check to ensure object payload is padded with ASCII NULL characters
when probing by name, as specified by RFC 8335
- Statically allocate buff using IFNAMSIZ
- Add rcu blocking around ipv6_dev_find
- Use __in_dev_get_rcu to access IPV4 addresses of identified
net_device
- Remove check for ICMPV6 PROBE types
---
net/ipv4/icmp.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
@@ -979,27 +983,127 @@ static bool icmp_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)*includedinthereply.*RFC1812:4.3.3.6SHOULDhaveaconfigoptionforsilentlyignoring*echorequests,MUSThavedefault=NOT.+*RFC8335:8MUSThaveaconfigoptiontoenable/disableICMP+*ExtendedEchoFunctionality,MUSTbedisabledbydefault*SeealsoWRThandlingofoptionsoncetheyaredoneandworking.*/staticboolicmp_echo(structsk_buff*skb){+structicmp_ext_hdr*ext_hdr,_ext_hdr;+structicmp_ext_echo_iio*iio,_iio;+structicmp_bxmicmp_param;+structnet_device*dev;structnet*net;+u16ident_len;+char*buff;+u8status;net=dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev);-if(!net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_ignore_all){-structicmp_bxmicmp_param;--icmp_param.data.icmph=*icmp_hdr(skb);-icmp_param.data.icmph.type=ICMP_ECHOREPLY;-icmp_param.skb=skb;-icmp_param.offset=0;-icmp_param.data_len=skb->len;-icmp_param.head_len=sizeof(structicmphdr);-icmp_reply(&icmp_param,skb);-}/* should there be an ICMP stat for ignored echos? */-returntrue;+if(net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_ignore_all)+returntrue;++icmp_param.data.icmph=*icmp_hdr(skb);+icmp_param.skb=skb;+icmp_param.offset=0;+icmp_param.data_len=skb->len;+icmp_param.head_len=sizeof(structicmphdr);++if(icmp_param.data.icmph.type==ICMP_ECHO)+gotosend_reply;+if(!net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_enable_probe)+returntrue;+/* We currently only support probing interfaces on the proxy node+*ChecktoensureL-bitisset+*/+if(!(ntohs(icmp_param.data.icmph.un.echo.sequence)&1))+returntrue;+/* Clear status bits in reply message */+icmp_param.data.icmph.un.echo.sequence&=htons(0xFF00);+icmp_param.data.icmph.type=ICMP_EXT_ECHOREPLY;+ext_hdr=skb_header_pointer(skb,0,sizeof(_ext_hdr),&_ext_hdr);+iio=skb_header_pointer(skb,sizeof(_ext_hdr),sizeof(_iio),&_iio);+if(!ext_hdr||!iio)+gotosend_mal_query;+if(ntohs(iio->extobj_hdr.length)<=sizeof(iio->extobj_hdr))+gotosend_mal_query;+ident_len=ntohs(iio->extobj_hdr.length)-sizeof(iio->extobj_hdr);+status=0;+dev=NULL;+switch(iio->extobj_hdr.class_type){+caseEXT_ECHO_CTYPE_NAME:+if(ident_len>=IFNAMSIZ)+gotosend_mal_query;+buff=kcalloc(IFNAMSIZ,sizeof(char),GFP_KERNEL);+if(!buff)+return-ENOMEM;+memcpy(buff,&iio->ident.name,ident_len);+/* RFC 8335 2.1 If the Object Payload would not otherwise terminate+*ona32-bitboundary,itMUSTbepaddedwithASCIINULLcharacters+*/+if(ident_len%sizeof(u32)!=0){+u8i;++for(i=ident_len;i%sizeof(u32)!=0;i++){+if(buff[i]!='\0')+gotosend_mal_query;+}+}+dev=dev_get_by_name(net,buff);+kfree(buff);+break;+caseEXT_ECHO_CTYPE_INDEX:+if(ident_len!=sizeof(iio->ident.ifindex))+gotosend_mal_query;+dev=dev_get_by_index(net,ntohl(iio->ident.ifindex));+break;+caseEXT_ECHO_CTYPE_ADDR:+if(ident_len!=sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr)+iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.addrlen)+gotosend_mal_query;+switch(ntohs(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.afi)){+caseICMP_AFI_IP:+if(ident_len!=sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr)+sizeof(structin_addr))+gotosend_mal_query;+dev=ip_dev_find(net,iio->ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv4_addr.s_addr);+break;+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)+caseICMP_AFI_IP6:+if(ident_len!=sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr)+sizeof(structin6_addr))+gotosend_mal_query;+rcu_read_lock();+dev=ipv6_dev_find(net,&iio->ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv6_addr,dev);+if(dev)+dev_hold(dev);+rcu_read_unlock();+break;+#endif+default:+gotosend_mal_query;+}+break;+default:+gotosend_mal_query;+}+if(!dev){+icmp_param.data.icmph.code=ICMP_EXT_NO_IF;+gotosend_reply;+}+/* Fill bits in reply message */+if(dev->flags&IFF_UP)+status|=EXT_ECHOREPLY_ACTIVE;+if(__in_dev_get_rcu(dev)&&__in_dev_get_rcu(dev)->ifa_list)+status|=EXT_ECHOREPLY_IPV4;+if(!list_empty(&dev->ip6_ptr->addr_list))+status|=EXT_ECHOREPLY_IPV6;+dev_put(dev);+icmp_param.data.icmph.un.echo.sequence|=htons(status);+send_reply:+icmp_reply(&icmp_param,skb);+returntrue;+send_mal_query:+icmp_param.data.icmph.code=ICMP_EXT_MAL_QUERY;+gotosend_reply;}/*
@@ -1088,6 +1192,11 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)icmph=icmp_hdr(skb);ICMPMSGIN_INC_STATS(net,icmph->type);++/* Check for ICMP Extended Echo (PROBE) messages */+if(icmph->type==ICMP_EXT_ECHO)+gotoprobe;+/**18isthehighest'known'ICMPtype.Anythingelseisamystery*
@@ -1097,7 +1206,6 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)if(icmph->type>NR_ICMP_TYPES)gotoerror;-/**ParsetheICMPmessage*/
@@ -1123,7 +1231,7 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)}success=icmp_pointers[icmph->type].handler(skb);-+success_check:if(success){consume_skb(skb);returnNET_RX_SUCCESS;
@@ -1137,6 +1245,12 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)error:__ICMP_INC_STATS(net,ICMP_MIB_INERRORS);gotodrop;+probe:+/* We can't use icmp_pointers[].handler() because it is an array of+*sizeNR_ICMP_TYPES+1(19elements)andPROBEhascode42.+*/+success=icmp_echo(skb);+gotosuccess_check;}staticboolip_icmp_error_rfc4884_validate(conststructsk_buff*skb,intoff)
@@ -1340,6 +1454,7 @@ static int __net_init icmp_sk_init(struct net *net)/* Control parameters for ECHO replies. */net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_ignore_all=0;+net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_enable_probe=0;net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts=1;/* Control parameter - ignore bogus broadcast responses? */
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2021-03-15 15:52:09
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:50 PM Andreas Roeseler
[off-list ref] wrote:
Modify the icmp_rcv function to check PROBE messages and call icmp_echo
if a PROBE request is detected.
Modify the existing icmp_echo function to respond ot both ping and PROBE
requests.
This was tested using a custom modification to the iputils package and
wireshark. It supports IPV4 probing by name, ifindex, and probing by
both IPV4 and IPV6 addresses. It currently does not support responding
to probes off the proxy node (see RFC 8335 Section 2).
If you happen to use github or something similar, if you don't mind
sharing the code, you could clone the iputils repo and publish the
changes. No pressure.
Is this path now missing
icmp_param.data.icmph.type = ICMP_ECHOREPLY;
+ if (!net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_echo_enable_probe)
+ return true;
+ /* We currently only support probing interfaces on the proxy node
+ * Check to ensure L-bit is set
+ */
+ if (!(ntohs(icmp_param.data.icmph.un.echo.sequence) & 1))
+ return true;
+ /* Clear status bits in reply message */
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.un.echo.sequence &= htons(0xFF00);
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.type = ICMP_EXT_ECHOREPLY;
+ ext_hdr = skb_header_pointer(skb, 0, sizeof(_ext_hdr), &_ext_hdr);
+ iio = skb_header_pointer(skb, sizeof(_ext_hdr), sizeof(_iio), &_iio);
+ if (!ext_hdr || !iio)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ if (ntohs(iio->extobj_hdr.length) <= sizeof(iio->extobj_hdr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ ident_len = ntohs(iio->extobj_hdr.length) - sizeof(iio->extobj_hdr);
+ status = 0;
+ dev = NULL;
+ switch (iio->extobj_hdr.class_type) {
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_NAME:
+ if (ident_len >= IFNAMSIZ)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ buff = kcalloc(IFNAMSIZ, sizeof(char), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buff)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(buff, &iio->ident.name, ident_len);
+ /* RFC 8335 2.1 If the Object Payload would not otherwise terminate
+ * on a 32-bit boundary, it MUST be padded with ASCII NULL characters
+ */
+ if (ident_len % sizeof(u32) != 0) {
+ u8 i;
+
+ for (i = ident_len; i % sizeof(u32) != 0; i++) {
+ if (buff[i] != '\0')
+ goto send_mal_query;
Memory leak. IFNAMSIZ is small enough that you can use on-stack allocation
Also, I think you can ignore if there are non-zero bytes beyond the
len. We need to safely parse to avoid integrity bugs in the kernel.
Beyond that, it's fine to be strict about what you send, liberal what
you accept.
quoted hunk
+ }
+ }
+ dev = dev_get_by_name(net, buff);
+ kfree(buff);
+ break;
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_INDEX:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.ifindex))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ntohl(iio->ident.ifindex));
+ break;
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_ADDR:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.addrlen)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ switch (ntohs(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.afi)) {
+ case ICMP_AFI_IP:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + sizeof(struct in_addr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ dev = ip_dev_find(net, iio->ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv4_addr.s_addr);
+ break;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case ICMP_AFI_IP6:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + sizeof(struct in6_addr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = ipv6_dev_find(net, &iio->ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv6_addr, dev);
+ if (dev)
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ break;
+#endif
+ default:
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ }
+ if (!dev) {
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.code = ICMP_EXT_NO_IF;
+ goto send_reply;
+ }
+ /* Fill bits in reply message */
+ if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
+ status |= EXT_ECHOREPLY_ACTIVE;
+ if (__in_dev_get_rcu(dev) && __in_dev_get_rcu(dev)->ifa_list)
+ status |= EXT_ECHOREPLY_IPV4;
+ if (!list_empty(&dev->ip6_ptr->addr_list))
+ status |= EXT_ECHOREPLY_IPV6;
+ dev_put(dev);
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.un.echo.sequence |= htons(status);
+send_reply:
+ icmp_reply(&icmp_param, skb);
+ return true;
+send_mal_query:
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.code = ICMP_EXT_MAL_QUERY;
+ goto send_reply;
}
/*
@@ -1088,6 +1192,11 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) icmph = icmp_hdr(skb); ICMPMSGIN_INC_STATS(net, icmph->type);++ /* Check for ICMP Extended Echo (PROBE) messages */+ if (icmph->type == ICMP_EXT_ECHO)+ goto probe;+ /* * 18 is the highest 'known' ICMP type. Anything else is a mystery *
@@ -1097,7 +1206,6 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) if (icmph->type > NR_ICMP_TYPES) goto error;- /* * Parse the ICMP message */
@@ -1123,7 +1231,7 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) } success = icmp_pointers[icmph->type].handler(skb);-+success_check: if (success) { consume_skb(skb); return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
@@ -1137,6 +1245,12 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) error: __ICMP_INC_STATS(net, ICMP_MIB_INERRORS); goto drop;+probe:+ /* We can't use icmp_pointers[].handler() because it is an array of+ * size NR_ICMP_TYPES + 1 (19 elements) and PROBE has code 42.+ */+ success = icmp_echo(skb);+ goto success_check;
From: Andreas Roeseler <hidden> Date: 2021-03-15 19:10:18
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 11:50 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:50 PM Andreas Roeseler
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Modify the icmp_rcv function to check PROBE messages and call
icmp_echo
if a PROBE request is detected.
Modify the existing icmp_echo function to respond ot both ping and
PROBE
requests.
This was tested using a custom modification to the iputils package
and
wireshark. It supports IPV4 probing by name, ifindex, and probing
by
both IPV4 and IPV6 addresses. It currently does not support
responding
to probes off the proxy node (see RFC 8335 Section 2).
If you happen to use github or something similar, if you don't mind
sharing the code, you could clone the iputils repo and publish the
changes. No pressure.
Should I include the link to the github repo in the patch?
+ status = 0;
+ dev = NULL;
+ switch (iio->extobj_hdr.class_type) {
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_NAME:
+ if (ident_len >= IFNAMSIZ)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ buff = kcalloc(IFNAMSIZ, sizeof(char), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buff)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(buff, &iio->ident.name, ident_len);
+ /* RFC 8335 2.1 If the Object Payload would not
otherwise terminate
+ * on a 32-bit boundary, it MUST be padded with
ASCII NULL characters
+ */
+ if (ident_len % sizeof(u32) != 0) {
+ u8 i;
+
+ for (i = ident_len; i % sizeof(u32) != 0;
i++) {
+ if (buff[i] != '\0')
+ goto send_mal_query;
Memory leak. IFNAMSIZ is small enough that you can use on-stack
allocation
Also, I think you can ignore if there are non-zero bytes beyond the
len. We need to safely parse to avoid integrity bugs in the kernel.
Beyond that, it's fine to be strict about what you send, liberal what
you accept.
This checks that the incoming request is padded to the nearest 32-bit
boundary by ASCII NULL characters, as specified by RFC 8335
quoted
+ }
+ }
+ dev = dev_get_by_name(net, buff);
+ kfree(buff);
+ break;
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_INDEX:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.ifindex))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ntohl(iio-
quoted
ident.ifindex));
+ break;
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_ADDR:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr)
+ iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.addrlen)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ switch (ntohs(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.afi)) {
+ case ICMP_AFI_IP:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + sizeof(struct in_addr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ dev = ip_dev_find(net, iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv4_addr.s_addr);
+ break;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case ICMP_AFI_IP6:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + sizeof(struct in6_addr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = ipv6_dev_find(net, &iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv6_addr, dev);
+ if (dev)
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ break;
+#endif
+ default:
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ }
+ if (!dev) {
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.code = ICMP_EXT_NO_IF;
+ goto send_reply;
+ }
+ /* Fill bits in reply message */
+ if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
+ status |= EXT_ECHOREPLY_ACTIVE;
+ if (__in_dev_get_rcu(dev) && __in_dev_get_rcu(dev)-
@@ -1137,6 +1245,12 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
error:
__ICMP_INC_STATS(net, ICMP_MIB_INERRORS);
goto drop;
+probe:
+ /* We can't use icmp_pointers[].handler() because it is an
array of
+ * size NR_ICMP_TYPES + 1 (19 elements) and PROBE has code
42.
+ */
+ success = icmp_echo(skb);
+ goto success_check;
just make this a branch instead of
Could you clarify this comment? Do you mean move this code to the
section where we check for PROBE messages instead of jumping to probe
and then jumping to success_check?
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2021-03-15 19:35:21
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:10 PM Andreas Roeseler
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 11:50 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:50 PM Andreas Roeseler
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Modify the icmp_rcv function to check PROBE messages and call
icmp_echo
if a PROBE request is detected.
Modify the existing icmp_echo function to respond ot both ping and
PROBE
requests.
This was tested using a custom modification to the iputils package
and
wireshark. It supports IPV4 probing by name, ifindex, and probing
by
both IPV4 and IPV6 addresses. It currently does not support
responding
to probes off the proxy node (see RFC 8335 Section 2).
If you happen to use github or something similar, if you don't mind
sharing the code, you could clone the iputils repo and publish the
changes. No pressure.
Should I include the link to the github repo in the patch?
If you don't mind, please do. It can serve as example for others to
use the feature, too.
+ status = 0;
+ dev = NULL;
+ switch (iio->extobj_hdr.class_type) {
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_NAME:
+ if (ident_len >= IFNAMSIZ)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ buff = kcalloc(IFNAMSIZ, sizeof(char), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buff)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(buff, &iio->ident.name, ident_len);
+ /* RFC 8335 2.1 If the Object Payload would not
otherwise terminate
+ * on a 32-bit boundary, it MUST be padded with
ASCII NULL characters
+ */
+ if (ident_len % sizeof(u32) != 0) {
+ u8 i;
+
+ for (i = ident_len; i % sizeof(u32) != 0;
i++) {
+ if (buff[i] != '\0')
+ goto send_mal_query;
Memory leak. IFNAMSIZ is small enough that you can use on-stack
allocation
Also, I think you can ignore if there are non-zero bytes beyond the
len. We need to safely parse to avoid integrity bugs in the kernel.
Beyond that, it's fine to be strict about what you send, liberal what
you accept.
This checks that the incoming request is padded to the nearest 32-bit
boundary by ASCII NULL characters, as specified by RFC 8335
Right. The question is whether you need to be strict in enforcing
that. Perhaps the RFC states that explicitly. Else, it's up to your
interpretation. I suggested the robustness principle, which is
commonly employed in such instances.
quoted
quoted
+ }
+ }
+ dev = dev_get_by_name(net, buff);
+ kfree(buff);
+ break;
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_INDEX:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.ifindex))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ntohl(iio-
quoted
ident.ifindex));
+ break;
+ case EXT_ECHO_CTYPE_ADDR:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr)
+ iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.addrlen)
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ switch (ntohs(iio->ident.addr.ctype3_hdr.afi)) {
+ case ICMP_AFI_IP:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + sizeof(struct in_addr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ dev = ip_dev_find(net, iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv4_addr.s_addr);
+ break;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case ICMP_AFI_IP6:
+ if (ident_len != sizeof(iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ctype3_hdr) + sizeof(struct in6_addr))
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = ipv6_dev_find(net, &iio-
quoted
ident.addr.ip_addr.ipv6_addr, dev);
+ if (dev)
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ break;
+#endif
+ default:
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ goto send_mal_query;
+ }
+ if (!dev) {
+ icmp_param.data.icmph.code = ICMP_EXT_NO_IF;
+ goto send_reply;
+ }
+ /* Fill bits in reply message */
+ if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
+ status |= EXT_ECHOREPLY_ACTIVE;
+ if (__in_dev_get_rcu(dev) && __in_dev_get_rcu(dev)-
@@ -1088,6 +1192,11 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) icmph = icmp_hdr(skb); ICMPMSGIN_INC_STATS(net, icmph->type);++ /* Check for ICMP Extended Echo (PROBE) messages */+ if (icmph->type == ICMP_EXT_ECHO)+ goto probe;+ /* * 18 is the highest 'known' ICMP type. Anything else
is a mystery
*
@@ -1097,7 +1206,6 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) if (icmph->type > NR_ICMP_TYPES) goto error;- /* * Parse the ICMP message */
@@ -1123,7 +1231,7 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) } success = icmp_pointers[icmph->type].handler(skb);-+success_check: if (success) { consume_skb(skb); return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
@@ -1137,6 +1245,12 @@ int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) error: __ICMP_INC_STATS(net, ICMP_MIB_INERRORS); goto drop;+probe:+ /* We can't use icmp_pointers[].handler() because it is an
array of
+ * size NR_ICMP_TYPES + 1 (19 elements) and PROBE has code
42.
+ */
+ success = icmp_echo(skb);
+ goto success_check;
just make this a branch instead of
Could you clarify this comment? Do you mean move this code to the
section where we check for PROBE messages instead of jumping to probe
and then jumping to success_check?