[PATCH 0/6] can: c_can: add support to 64 messages objects

STALE1987d

8 messages, 2 authors, 2021-02-25 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 0/6] can: c_can: add support to 64 messages objects

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:54:56

The D_CAN controller supports up to 128 messages. Until now the driver
only managed 32 messages although Sitara processors and DRA7 SOC can
handle 64.

The series was tested on a beaglebone board.

Note:
I have not changed the type of tx_field (belonging to the c_can_priv
structure) to atomic64_t because I think the atomic_t type has size
of at least 32 bits on x86 and arm, which is enough to handle 64
messages.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=139746476821294&w=2 reports the results
of tests performed just on x86 and arm architectures.


Dario Binacchi (6):
  can: c_can: remove unused code
  can: c_can: fix indentation
  can: c_can: fix control interface used by c_can_do_tx
  can: c_can: use 32-bit write to set arbitration register
  can: c_can: prepare to up the message objects number
  can: c_can: add support to 64 messages objects

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c          | 83 ++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h          | 32 ++++------
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c |  6 +-
 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH 1/6] can: c_can: remove unused code

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:55:16

Commit 9d23a9818cb1 ("can: c_can: Remove unused inline function") left
behind C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_LAST constant.

Commit fa39b54ccf28 ("can: c_can: Get rid of pointless interrupts") left
behind C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST and C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT constants.

The removed code also made a comment useless and misleading.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <redacted>
---

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 3 +--
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index ef474bae47a1..a962ceefd44a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -848,8 +848,7 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv)
  * c_can core saves a received CAN message into the first free message
  * object it finds free (starting with the lowest). Bits NEWDAT and
  * INTPND are set for this message object indicating that a new message
- * has arrived. To work-around this issue, we keep two groups of message
- * objects whose partitioning is defined by C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT.
+ * has arrived.
  *
  * We clear the newdat bit right away.
  *
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
index 92213d3d96eb..90d3d2e7a086 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
@@ -32,11 +32,7 @@
 				C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM - 1)
 
 #define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST	(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST + 1)
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_LAST	(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST + \
-				C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)
 
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT	9
-#define C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST	(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT - 1)
 #define RECEIVE_OBJECT_BITS	0x0000ffff
 
 enum reg {
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH 5/6] can: c_can: prepare to up the message objects number

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:55:16

As pointed by commit c0a9f4d396c9 ("can: c_can: Reduce register access")
the "driver casts the 16 message objects in stone, which is completely
braindead as contemporary hardware has up to 128 message objects".

The patch prepares the module to extend the number of message objects
beyond the 32 currently managed. This was achieved by transforming the
constants used to manage RX/TX messages into variables without changing
the driver policy.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <redacted>
---

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c          | 56 +++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h          | 23 +++++------
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index 7081cfaf62e2..772b26685fea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -173,9 +173,6 @@
 /* Wait for ~1 sec for INIT bit */
 #define INIT_WAIT_MS		1000
 
-/* napi related */
-#define C_CAN_NAPI_WEIGHT	C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM
-
 /* c_can lec values */
 enum c_can_lec_type {
 	LEC_NO_ERROR = 0,
@@ -325,7 +322,7 @@ static void c_can_setup_tx_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface,
 	 * first, i.e. clear the MSGVAL flag in the arbiter.
 	 */
 	if (rtr != (bool)test_bit(idx, &priv->tx_dir)) {
-		u32 obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
+		u32 obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
 
 		c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, iface, obj);
 		change_bit(idx, &priv->tx_dir);
@@ -463,10 +460,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	 * prioritized. The lowest buffer number wins.
 	 */
 	idx = fls(atomic_read(&priv->tx_active));
-	obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
+	obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
 
 	/* If this is the last buffer, stop the xmit queue */
-	if (idx == C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)
+	if (idx == priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
 	/*
 	 * Store the message in the interface so we can call
@@ -549,17 +546,18 @@ static int c_can_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
  */
 static void c_can_configure_msg_objects(struct net_device *dev)
 {
+	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	int i;
 
 	/* first invalidate all message objects */
-	for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i <= C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS; i++)
+	for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i <= priv->msg_obj_num; i++)
 		c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IF_RX, i);
 
 	/* setup receive message objects */
-	for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i < C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST; i++)
+	for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i < priv->msg_obj_rx_last; i++)
 		c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, i, 0, 0, IF_MCONT_RCV);
 
-	c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST, 0, 0,
+	c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, priv->msg_obj_rx_last, 0, 0,
 				   IF_MCONT_RCV_EOB);
 }
 
@@ -730,7 +728,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 	while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
 		idx--;
 		pend &= ~(1 << idx);
-		obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
+		obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
 		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
 		can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
 		bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
@@ -740,7 +738,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 	/* Clear the bits in the tx_active mask */
 	atomic_sub(clr, &priv->tx_active);
 
-	if (clr & (1 << (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)))
+	if (clr & (1 << (priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)))
 		netif_wake_queue(dev);
 
 	if (pkts) {
@@ -755,11 +753,11 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
  * raced with the hardware or failed to readout all upper
  * objects in the last run due to quota limit.
  */
-static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend)
+static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend, u32 rx_mask)
 {
 	u32 weight, lasts;
 
-	if (pend == RECEIVE_OBJECT_BITS)
+	if (pend == rx_mask)
 		return pend;
 
 	/*
@@ -862,8 +860,7 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
 	 * It is faster to read only one 16bit register. This is only possible
 	 * for a maximum number of 16 objects.
 	 */
-	BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST > 16,
-			"Implementation does not support more message objects than 16");
+	WARN_ON(priv->msg_obj_rx_last > 16);
 
 	while (quota > 0) {
 		if (!pend) {
@@ -874,7 +871,8 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
 			 * If the pending field has a gap, handle the
 			 * bits above the gap first.
 			 */
-			toread = c_can_adjust_pending(pend);
+			toread = c_can_adjust_pending(pend,
+						      priv->msg_obj_rx_mask);
 		} else {
 			toread = pend;
 		}
@@ -1205,17 +1203,36 @@ static int c_can_close(struct net_device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void)
+struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(int msg_obj_num)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct c_can_priv *priv;
+	int msg_obj_tx_num = msg_obj_num / 2;
 
-	dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct c_can_priv), C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM);
+	dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct c_can_priv), msg_obj_tx_num);
 	if (!dev)
 		return NULL;
 
 	priv = netdev_priv(dev);
-	netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, C_CAN_NAPI_WEIGHT);
+	priv->msg_obj_num = msg_obj_num;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_num = msg_obj_num - msg_obj_tx_num;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_first = 1;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_last =
+		priv->msg_obj_rx_first + priv->msg_obj_rx_num - 1;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_mask = ((u64)1 << priv->msg_obj_rx_num) - 1;
+
+	priv->msg_obj_tx_num = msg_obj_tx_num;
+	priv->msg_obj_tx_first = priv->msg_obj_rx_last + 1;
+	priv->msg_obj_tx_last =
+		priv->msg_obj_tx_first + priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1;
+
+	priv->dlc = kcalloc(msg_obj_tx_num, sizeof(*priv->dlc), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv->dlc) {
+		free_candev(dev);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, priv->msg_obj_rx_num);
 
 	priv->dev = dev;
 	priv->can.bittiming_const = &c_can_bittiming_const;
@@ -1320,6 +1337,7 @@ void free_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev)
 	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 
 	netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
+	kfree(priv->dlc);
 	free_candev(dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(free_c_can_dev);
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
index 90d3d2e7a086..1dbe777320f5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
@@ -22,18 +22,7 @@
 #ifndef C_CAN_H
 #define C_CAN_H
 
-/* message object split */
 #define C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS	32
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM	16
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM	16
-
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST	1
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST	(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST + \
-				C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM - 1)
-
-#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST	(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST + 1)
-
-#define RECEIVE_OBJECT_BITS	0x0000ffff
 
 enum reg {
 	C_CAN_CTRL_REG = 0,
@@ -193,6 +182,14 @@ struct c_can_priv {
 	struct napi_struct napi;
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct device *device;
+	int msg_obj_num;
+	int msg_obj_rx_num;
+	int msg_obj_tx_num;
+	int msg_obj_rx_first;
+	int msg_obj_rx_last;
+	int msg_obj_tx_first;
+	int msg_obj_tx_last;
+	u32 msg_obj_rx_mask;
 	atomic_t tx_active;
 	atomic_t sie_pending;
 	unsigned long tx_dir;
@@ -209,10 +206,10 @@ struct c_can_priv {
 	void (*raminit) (const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable);
 	u32 comm_rcv_high;
 	u32 rxmasked;
-	u32 dlc[C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM];
+	u32 *dlc;
 };
 
-struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void);
+struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(int msg_obj_num);
 void free_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev);
 int register_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev);
 void unregister_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
index 05f425ceb53a..a5b9b1a93702 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/* allocate the c_can device */
-	dev = alloc_c_can_dev();
+	dev = alloc_c_can_dev(C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS);
 	if (!dev) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto exit;
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH 6/6] can: c_can: add support to 64 messages objects

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:55:17

D_CAN controller supports 16, 32, 64 or 128 messages objects, comparing
to 32 on C_CAN.
AM335x/AM437x Sitara processors and DRA7 SOC all instantiate a D_CAN
controller with 64 message objects, as described in the "DCAN features"
subsection of the CAN chapter of their technical reference manuals.

The driver policy has been kept unchanged, and as in the previous
version, the first half of the message objects is used for reception and
the second for transmission.

The I/O load is increased only in the case of 64 message objects,
keeping it unchanged in the case of 32. Two 32-bit read accesses are in
fact required, which however remained at 16-bit for configurations with
32 message objects.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <redacted>

---

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c          | 19 +++++++++++--------
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h          |  5 +++--
 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c |  6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index 772b26685fea..3429eab5ac7d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -723,8 +723,12 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 	struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
 	u32 idx, obj, pkts = 0, bytes = 0, pend, clr;
 
-	clr = pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_INTPND2_REG);
+	if (priv->msg_obj_tx_last > 32)
+		pend = priv->read_reg32(priv, C_CAN_INTPND3_REG);
+	else
+		pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_INTPND2_REG);
 
+	clr = pend;
 	while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
 		idx--;
 		pend &= ~(1 << idx);
@@ -834,7 +838,12 @@ static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
 
 static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv)
 {
-	u32 pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_NEWDAT1_REG);
+	u32 pend;
+
+	if (priv->msg_obj_rx_last > 16)
+		pend = priv->read_reg32(priv, C_CAN_NEWDAT1_REG);
+	else
+		pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_NEWDAT1_REG);
 
 	return pend;
 }
@@ -856,12 +865,6 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
 	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	u32 pkts = 0, pend = 0, toread, n;
 
-	/*
-	 * It is faster to read only one 16bit register. This is only possible
-	 * for a maximum number of 16 objects.
-	 */
-	WARN_ON(priv->msg_obj_rx_last > 16);
-
 	while (quota > 0) {
 		if (!pend) {
 			pend = c_can_get_pending(priv);
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
index 1dbe777320f5..7cf92a576d4a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
 #ifndef C_CAN_H
 #define C_CAN_H
 
-#define C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS	32
-
 enum reg {
 	C_CAN_CTRL_REG = 0,
 	C_CAN_CTRL_EX_REG,
@@ -61,6 +59,7 @@ enum reg {
 	C_CAN_NEWDAT2_REG,
 	C_CAN_INTPND1_REG,
 	C_CAN_INTPND2_REG,
+	C_CAN_INTPND3_REG,
 	C_CAN_MSGVAL1_REG,
 	C_CAN_MSGVAL2_REG,
 	C_CAN_FUNCTION_REG,
@@ -122,6 +121,7 @@ static const u16 __maybe_unused reg_map_d_can[] = {
 	[C_CAN_NEWDAT2_REG]	= 0x9E,
 	[C_CAN_INTPND1_REG]	= 0xB0,
 	[C_CAN_INTPND2_REG]	= 0xB2,
+	[C_CAN_INTPND3_REG]	= 0xB4,
 	[C_CAN_MSGVAL1_REG]	= 0xC4,
 	[C_CAN_MSGVAL2_REG]	= 0xC6,
 	[C_CAN_IF1_COMREQ_REG]	= 0x100,
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct raminit_bits {
 
 struct c_can_driver_data {
 	enum c_can_dev_id id;
+	int msg_obj_num;
 
 	/* RAMINIT register description. Optional. */
 	const struct raminit_bits *raminit_bits; /* Array of START/DONE bit positions */
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
index a5b9b1a93702..87a145b67a2f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
@@ -192,10 +192,12 @@ static void c_can_hw_raminit(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable)
 
 static const struct c_can_driver_data c_can_drvdata = {
 	.id = BOSCH_C_CAN,
+	.msg_obj_num = 32,
 };
 
 static const struct c_can_driver_data d_can_drvdata = {
 	.id = BOSCH_D_CAN,
+	.msg_obj_num = 32,
 };
 
 static const struct raminit_bits dra7_raminit_bits[] = {
@@ -205,6 +207,7 @@ static const struct raminit_bits dra7_raminit_bits[] = {
 
 static const struct c_can_driver_data dra7_dcan_drvdata = {
 	.id = BOSCH_D_CAN,
+	.msg_obj_num = 64,
 	.raminit_num = ARRAY_SIZE(dra7_raminit_bits),
 	.raminit_bits = dra7_raminit_bits,
 	.raminit_pulse = true,
@@ -217,6 +220,7 @@ static const struct raminit_bits am3352_raminit_bits[] = {
 
 static const struct c_can_driver_data am3352_dcan_drvdata = {
 	.id = BOSCH_D_CAN,
+	.msg_obj_num = 64,
 	.raminit_num = ARRAY_SIZE(am3352_raminit_bits),
 	.raminit_bits = am3352_raminit_bits,
 };
@@ -293,7 +297,7 @@ static int c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/* allocate the c_can device */
-	dev = alloc_c_can_dev(C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS);
+	dev = alloc_c_can_dev(drvdata->msg_obj_num);
 	if (!dev) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto exit;
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH 2/6] can: c_can: fix indentation

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:55:48

Commit 524369e2391f ("can: c_can: remove obsolete STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING Kconfig option")
left behind wrong indentation, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <redacted>
---

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index a962ceefd44a..dbcc1c1c92d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend)
 static inline void c_can_rx_object_get(struct net_device *dev,
 				       struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
 {
-		c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
+	c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
 }
 
 static inline void c_can_rx_finalize(struct net_device *dev,
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH 3/6] can: c_can: fix control interface used by c_can_do_tx

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:55:48

According to commit 640916db2bf7 ("can: c_can: Make it SMP safe") let RX use
IF1 (i.e. IF_RX) and TX use IF2 (i.e. IF_TX).

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <redacted>
---

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index dbcc1c1c92d6..69526c3a671c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 		idx--;
 		pend &= ~(1 << idx);
 		obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
-		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_RX, obj);
+		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
 		can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
 		bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
 		pkts++;
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH 4/6] can: c_can: use 32-bit write to set arbitration register

From: Dario Binacchi <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-24 22:56:54

The arbitration register is already set up with 32-bit writes in the
other parts of the code except for this point.

Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <redacted>
---

 drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index 69526c3a671c..7081cfaf62e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -297,8 +297,7 @@ static void c_can_inval_msg_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface, int obj)
 {
 	struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 
-	priv->write_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(ARB1_REG, iface), 0);
-	priv->write_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(ARB2_REG, iface), 0);
+	priv->write_reg32(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(ARB1_REG, iface), 0);
 	c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, iface, obj);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH 5/6] can: c_can: prepare to up the message objects number

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-02-25 07:25:12

Hey Dario,

just a quick note...

On 24.02.2021 23:52:45, Dario Binacchi wrote:
-struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void)
+struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(int msg_obj_num)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct c_can_priv *priv;
+	int msg_obj_tx_num = msg_obj_num / 2;
 
-	dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct c_can_priv), C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM);
+	dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct c_can_priv), msg_obj_tx_num);
 	if (!dev)
 		return NULL;
 
 	priv = netdev_priv(dev);
-	netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, C_CAN_NAPI_WEIGHT);
+	priv->msg_obj_num = msg_obj_num;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_num = msg_obj_num - msg_obj_tx_num;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_first = 1;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_last =
+		priv->msg_obj_rx_first + priv->msg_obj_rx_num - 1;
+	priv->msg_obj_rx_mask = ((u64)1 << priv->msg_obj_rx_num) - 1;
+
+	priv->msg_obj_tx_num = msg_obj_tx_num;
+	priv->msg_obj_tx_first = priv->msg_obj_rx_last + 1;
+	priv->msg_obj_tx_last =
+		priv->msg_obj_tx_first + priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1;
+
+	priv->dlc = kcalloc(msg_obj_tx_num, sizeof(*priv->dlc), GFP_KERNEL);
You can pass a larger size to alloc_candev() so that it includes the mem
you allocate here.
+	if (!priv->dlc) {
+		free_candev(dev);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, priv->msg_obj_rx_num);
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help