@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static void happy_meal_poll_stop(struct happy_meal *hp, void __iomem *tregs)ASD(("done\n"));}-/* Only Sun can take such nice parts and fuck up the programming interface+/* Only Sun can take such nice parts and mess up the programming interface*likethis.Goodjobguys...*/#define TCVR_RESET_TRIES 16 /* It should reset quickly */
@@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ static void happy_meal_rx(struct happy_meal *hp, struct net_device *dev)skb=copy_skb;}-/* This card is _fucking_ hot... */+/* This card is _sooooo_ hot... */skb->csum=csum_unfold(~(__force__sum16)htons(csum));skb->ip_summed=CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;--
Right or wrong, these are not "spelling fixes".
Please do not misrepresent your patch in your Subject: line.
(Also, subsystem prefix should probably just be "net: sunhme:".)
-ed
Right or wrong, these are not "spelling fixes".
Please do not misrepresent your patch in your Subject: line.
(Also, subsystem prefix should probably just be "net: sunhme:".)
I think Steven already explained on the printf patch that the "obscene"
language rules apply to new code only, so I marked this as Rejected
silently.
Right or wrong, these are not "spelling fixes".
Please do not misrepresent your patch in your Subject: line.
(Also, subsystem prefix should probably just be "net: sunhme:".)
I think Steven already explained on the printf patch that the "obscene"
language rules apply to new code only, so I marked this as Rejected
silently.