Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-09 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-08 15:31:35

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:01:59PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
Hi Mani,

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 14:44, Manivannan Sadhasivam <
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:43:43PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
quoted
Currently, the MHI controller driver defines which channels should
have their inbound buffers allocated and queued. But ideally, this is
something that should be decided by the MHI device driver instead,
We call them, "MHI client drivers"
I'll fix that.

quoted
quoted
which actually deals with that buffers.

Add a flag parameter to mhi_prepare_for_transfer allowing to specify
if buffers have to be allocated and queued by the MHI stack.

Keep auto_queue flag for now, but should be removed at some point.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <redacted>
---
 drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h |  2 +-
 drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c     | 11 ++++++++---
 drivers/net/mhi_net.c           |  2 +-
 include/linux/mhi.h             | 12 +++++++++++-
 net/qrtr/mhi.c                  |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/mhi_net.c b/drivers/net/mhi_net.c
index fa41d8c..b7f7f2e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mhi_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mhi_net.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int mhi_net_probe(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
      u64_stats_init(&mhi_netdev->stats.tx_syncp);

      /* Start MHI channels */
-     err = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev);
+     err = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev, 0);
Eventhough I'd like Hemant to comment on this patch, AFAIU this looks to
me a controller dependent behaviour. The controller should have the
information whether a particular channel can auto queue or not then the
client driver can be agnostic.
The client driver can not be agnostic if this information is defined on the
controller side. In one case client driver needs to allocate (and queue)
its own buffers and in the other case it uses the pre-allocated ones.
Moreover, that will break compatibility if we have one controller (e.g. a
Wifi MHI controller) that e.g. defines IPCR channels as pre-allocated and
another one that defines IPCR channels as non-pre-allocated. Having
pre-allocated channels is not something related to the MHI device but to
how the host (client driver) wants to manage buffers. It would then make
sense to let this choice to the client driver.

quoted
quoted
      if (err)
              goto out_err;
diff --git a/include/linux/mhi.h b/include/linux/mhi.h
index 209b335..6723339 100644
--- a/include/linux/mhi.h
+++ b/include/linux/mhi.h
@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ enum mhi_flags {
 };

 /**
+ * enum mhi_chan_flags - MHI channel flags
+ * @MHI_CH_INBOUND_ALLOC_BUFS: Automatically allocate and queue inbound
buffers
quoted
+ */
+enum mhi_chan_flags {
+     MHI_CH_INBOUND_ALLOC_BUFS = BIT(0),
+};
+
+/**
  * enum mhi_device_type - Device types
  * @MHI_DEVICE_XFER: Handles data transfer
  * @MHI_DEVICE_CONTROLLER: Control device
@@ -705,8 +713,10 @@ void mhi_device_put(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev);
 /**
  * mhi_prepare_for_transfer - Setup channel for data transfer
  * @mhi_dev: Device associated with the channels
+ * @flags: MHI channel flags
  */
-int mhi_prepare_for_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev);
+int mhi_prepare_for_transfer(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
+                          enum mhi_chan_flags flags);

 /**
  * mhi_unprepare_from_transfer - Unprepare the channels
diff --git a/net/qrtr/mhi.c b/net/qrtr/mhi.c
index 2bf2b19..47afded 100644
--- a/net/qrtr/mhi.c
+++ b/net/qrtr/mhi.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_probe(struct mhi_device
*mhi_dev,
quoted
      int rc;

      /* start channels */
-     rc = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev);
+     rc = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev, MHI_CH_INBOUND_ALLOC_BUFS);
Are you sure it requires auto queued channel?
This is how mhi-qrtr has been implemented, yes.
skb is allocated in qrtr_endpoint_post(). Then how the host can pre
allocate the buffer here? Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Mani
Regards,
Loic

Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag

From: Hemant Kumar <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-09 04:38:30


On 1/8/21 7:30 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:01:59PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
quoted
Hi Mani,

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 14:44, Manivannan Sadhasivam <
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:43:43PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
quoted
Currently, the MHI controller driver defines which channels should
have their inbound buffers allocated and queued. But ideally, this is
something that should be decided by the MHI device driver instead,
We call them, "MHI client drivers"
I'll fix that.

quoted
quoted
which actually deals with that buffers.

Add a flag parameter to mhi_prepare_for_transfer allowing to specify
if buffers have to be allocated and queued by the MHI stack.

Keep auto_queue flag for now, but should be removed at some point.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <redacted>
---
  drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h |  2 +-
  drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c     | 11 ++++++++---
  drivers/net/mhi_net.c           |  2 +-
  include/linux/mhi.h             | 12 +++++++++++-
  net/qrtr/mhi.c                  |  2 +-
  5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/mhi_net.c b/drivers/net/mhi_net.c
index fa41d8c..b7f7f2e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mhi_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mhi_net.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int mhi_net_probe(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
       u64_stats_init(&mhi_netdev->stats.tx_syncp);

       /* Start MHI channels */
-     err = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev);
+     err = mhi_prepare_for_transfer(mhi_dev, 0);
Eventhough I'd like Hemant to comment on this patch, AFAIU this looks to
me a controller dependent behaviour. The controller should have the
information whether a particular channel can auto queue or not then the
client driver can be agnostic.
I am fine with his change, and agree that MHI client driver should be 
able to make the decision.
Having said that, can we merge this on top of UCI :).
[..]

Thanks,
Hemant
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help