[PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues

Subsystems: networking drivers, the rest, virtio net driver

STALE2023d REVIEWED: 1 (1M)

1 review trailer.

5 messages, 5 authors, 2021-02-18 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues

From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2021-01-13 08:11:07

The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.

This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
__netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ba8e637..7a3b2a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
 	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;
 
+	/* xdp_queue_pairs may be 0, when xdp is already loaded. So add this. */
+	bool xdp_enabled;
+
 	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
 	bool big_packets;
 
@@ -481,14 +484,34 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
 	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+	} else {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
 
-	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
 	return &vi->sq[qp];
 }
 
+static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+	}
+}
+
 static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
 {
@@ -512,7 +535,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (!xdp_prog)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -560,12 +583,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
 	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
 
+	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
-	return vi->xdp_queue_pairs ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
+	return vi->xdp_enabled ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
 }
 
 /* We copy the packet for XDP in the following cases:
@@ -1457,12 +1481,13 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 		xdp_do_flush();
 
 	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
-		sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+		sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
 		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
 			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
 			sq->stats.kicks++;
 			u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
 		}
+		virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
 	}
 
 	return received;
@@ -2416,12 +2441,8 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		xdp_qp = nr_cpu_ids;
 
 	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
-	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Too few free TX rings available");
-		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
-			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs)
+		xdp_qp = 0;
 
 	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
 	if (!prog && !old_prog)
@@ -2453,12 +2474,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
 	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
 
+	vi->xdp_enabled = false;
 	if (prog) {
 		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
 			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
 			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
 				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
 		}
+		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -2526,7 +2549,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
 	int err;
 
 	if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
-		if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
+		if (vi->xdp_enabled)
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-16 01:48:40

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:08:57 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.

This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
__netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Since reviews are not coming in let me share some of mine.

nit: please put [PATCH net-next] not [PATCH netdev]
-static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
 	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
nit: please order variable declaration lines longest to shortest
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+	} else {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
 
-	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
 	return &vi->sq[qp];
 }
 
+static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
nit: longest to shortest
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
Feels a little wasteful to do the modulo calculation twice per packet.
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+	}
+}
+	vi->xdp_enabled = false;
 	if (prog) {
 		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
 			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
 			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
 				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
 		}
+		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
is xdp_enabled really needed? can't we do the headroom calculation
based on the program pointer being not NULL? Either way xdp_enabled 
should not temporarily switch true -> false -> true when program 
is swapped.
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {

Re: [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-02-10 21:42:19

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:08:57PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.

This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
__netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
I'd like to get some advice on whether this is ok from some
XDP experts - previously my understanding was that it is
preferable to disable XDP for such devices than
use locks on XDP fast path.
quoted hunk
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ba8e637..7a3b2a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
 	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;
 
+	/* xdp_queue_pairs may be 0, when xdp is already loaded. So add this. */
+	bool xdp_enabled;
+
 	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
 	bool big_packets;
 
@@ -481,14 +484,34 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
 	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+	} else {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
 
-	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
 	return &vi->sq[qp];
 }
 
+static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+	}
+}
+
 static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
 {
@@ -512,7 +535,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (!xdp_prog)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -560,12 +583,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
 	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
 
+	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
-	return vi->xdp_queue_pairs ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
+	return vi->xdp_enabled ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
 }
 
 /* We copy the packet for XDP in the following cases:
@@ -1457,12 +1481,13 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 		xdp_do_flush();
 
 	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
-		sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+		sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
 		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
 			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
 			sq->stats.kicks++;
 			u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
 		}
+		virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
 	}
 
 	return received;
@@ -2416,12 +2441,8 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		xdp_qp = nr_cpu_ids;
 
 	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
-	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Too few free TX rings available");
-		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
-			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs)
+		xdp_qp = 0;
 
 	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
 	if (!prog && !old_prog)
@@ -2453,12 +2474,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
 	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
 
+	vi->xdp_enabled = false;
 	if (prog) {
 		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
 			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
 			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
 				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
 		}
+		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -2526,7 +2549,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
 	int err;
 
 	if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
-		if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
+		if (vi->xdp_enabled)
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-11 11:07:23

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:41 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:08:57PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
quoted
The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.

This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
__netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.
I'm a little puzzled about the choice of using the netdevice TXQ
lock __netif_tx_lock() / __netif_tx_unlock().
Can you explain more about this choice?
quoted
Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>  
I'd like to get some advice on whether this is ok from some
XDP experts - previously my understanding was that it is
preferable to disable XDP for such devices than
use locks on XDP fast path.
I think it is acceptable, because the ndo_xdp_xmit / virtnet_xdp_xmit
takes a bulk of packets (currently 16).

Some drivers already does this.

It would have been nice if we could set a feature flag, that allow
users to see that this driver uses locking in the XDP transmit
(ndo_xdp_xmit) function call... but it seems like a pipe dream :-P

Code related to the locking
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ba8e637..7a3b2a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
[...]
quoted
@@ -481,14 +484,34 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
 	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+	} else {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
 
-	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
 	return &vi->sq[qp];
 }
 
+static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+	}
+}
+
 static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
 {
@@ -512,7 +535,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (!xdp_prog)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -560,12 +583,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
 	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
 
+	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
 	return ret;
 }
 


-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Re: [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-18 02:20:38

On 2021/2/11 5:40 上午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:08:57PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
quoted
The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.

This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
__netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
I'd like to get some advice on whether this is ok from some
XDP experts - previously my understanding was that it is
preferable to disable XDP for such devices than
use locks on XDP fast path.

I think this is acceptable on the device that changing the number of 
queues is not easy. For virtio-net, it probably requires a lot of 
changes in the management.

Another example is TUN which use TX lock for XDP.

Thanks

quoted
---
  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ba8e637..7a3b2a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
  	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
  	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;
  
+	/* xdp_queue_pairs may be 0, when xdp is already loaded. So add this. */
+	bool xdp_enabled;
+
  	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
  	bool big_packets;
  
@@ -481,14 +484,34 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
  	return 0;
  }
  
-static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
  {
  	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+	} else {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
  
-	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
  	return &vi->sq[qp];
  }
  
+static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+	unsigned int qp;
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+	}
+}
+
  static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
  			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
  {
@@ -512,7 +535,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
  	if (!xdp_prog)
  		return -ENXIO;
  
-	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
  
  	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
  		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -560,12 +583,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
  	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
  	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
  
+	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
  	return ret;
  }
  
  static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
  {
-	return vi->xdp_queue_pairs ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
+	return vi->xdp_enabled ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
  }
  
  /* We copy the packet for XDP in the following cases:
@@ -1457,12 +1481,13 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
  		xdp_do_flush();
  
  	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
-		sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+		sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
  		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
  			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
  			sq->stats.kicks++;
  			u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
  		}
+		virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
  	}
  
  	return received;
@@ -2416,12 +2441,8 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
  		xdp_qp = nr_cpu_ids;
  
  	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
-	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Too few free TX rings available");
-		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
-			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs)
+		xdp_qp = 0;
  
  	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
  	if (!prog && !old_prog)
@@ -2453,12 +2474,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
  	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
  	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
  
+	vi->xdp_enabled = false;
  	if (prog) {
  		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
  			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
  			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
  				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
  		}
+		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
  	}
  
  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -2526,7 +2549,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
  	int err;
  
  	if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
-		if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
+		if (vi->xdp_enabled)
  			return -EBUSY;
  
  		if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
-- 
1.8.3.1

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help