Re: [PATCH] ath9k: fix build error with LEDS_CLASS=m
From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 10:40:35
Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:04 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 15:38, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:I meant that having MAC80211_LEDS selected causes the ath9k driver to toggle on/off the WiFi LED. Every second, regardless whether it's doing something or not. In my setup, I have problems with a WiFi dongle somehow crashing (WiFi disappears, nothing comes from the dongle... maybe it's Atheros FW, maybe some HW problem) and I found this LED on/off slightly increases the chances of this dongle-crash. That was the actual reason behind my commits. Second reason is that I don't want to send USB commands every second when the device is idle. It unnecessarily consumes power on my low-power device.Ok, I see.quoted
Of course another solution is to just disable the trigger via sysfs LED API. It would also work but my patch allows entire code to be compiled-out (which was conditional in ath9k already). Therefore the patch I sent allows the ath9k LED option to be fully choosable. Someone wants every-second-LED-blink, sure, enable ATH9K_LEDS and you have it. Someone wants to reduce the kernel size, don't enable ATH9K_LEDS.Originally, I think this is what CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS was meant for, but it seems that this is not actually practical, since this also gets selected by half of the drivers using it, while the other half have a dependency on it. Out of the ones that select it, some in turn select LEDS_CLASS, while some depend on it. I think this needs a larger-scale cleanup for consistency between (at least) all the wireless drivers using LEDs.
I agree, this needs cleanup.
Either your patch or mine should get applied in the meantime, and I don't care much which one in this case, as we still have the remaining inconsistency.
My problem with Krzysztof's patch[1] is that it adds a new Kconfig option for ath9k, is that really necessary? Like Arnd said, we should fix drivers to use CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS instead of having driver specific options. So I would prefer take this Arnd's patch instead and queue it for v5.11. But as it modifies mac80211 I'll need an ack from Johannes, what do you think? [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20201227143034.1134829-1-krzk@kernel.org/ -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches