[PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

Subsystems: bpf [core], bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), the rest

STALE2038d LANDED

Landed in mainline as 744ea4e3885e on 2021-01-14.

6 messages, 4 authors, 2021-01-14 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

From: Gilad Reti <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-13 05:39:53

Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 17270b8404f1..36af69fac591 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2217,6 +2217,8 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
 	case PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF:
 	case PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL:
 	case PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID:
+	case PTR_TO_MEM:
+	case PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL:
 		return true;
 	default:
 		return false;
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill

From: Gilad Reti <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-13 05:40:21

Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back 
in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 12 +++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 777a81404fdb..f8569f04064b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 #define MAX_INSNS	BPF_MAXINSNS
 #define MAX_TEST_INSNS	1000000
 #define MAX_FIXUPS	8
-#define MAX_NR_MAPS	20
+#define MAX_NR_MAPS	21
 #define MAX_TEST_RUNS	8
 #define POINTER_VALUE	0xcafe4all
 #define TEST_DATA_LEN	64
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	int fixup_sk_storage_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	int fixup_map_event_output[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	int fixup_map_reuseport_array[MAX_FIXUPS];
+	int fixup_map_ringbuf[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	const char *errstr;
 	const char *errstr_unpriv;
 	uint32_t insn_processed;
@@ -640,6 +641,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 	int *fixup_sk_storage_map = test->fixup_sk_storage_map;
 	int *fixup_map_event_output = test->fixup_map_event_output;
 	int *fixup_map_reuseport_array = test->fixup_map_reuseport_array;
+	int *fixup_map_ringbuf = test->fixup_map_ringbuf;
 
 	if (test->fill_helper) {
 		test->fill_insns = calloc(MAX_TEST_INSNS, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
@@ -817,6 +819,14 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 			fixup_map_reuseport_array++;
 		} while (*fixup_map_reuseport_array);
 	}
+	if (*fixup_map_ringbuf) {
+		map_fds[20] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF, 0,
+					   0, 4096);
+		do {
+			prog[*fixup_map_ringbuf].imm = map_fds[20];
+			fixup_map_ringbuf++;
+		} while (*fixup_map_ringbuf);
+	}
 }
 
 struct libcap {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
index 45d43bf82f26..0b943897aaf6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
@@ -28,6 +28,36 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
 },
+{
+	"check valid spill/fill, ptr to mem",
+	.insns = {
+	/* reserve 8 byte ringbuf memory */
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_reserve),
+	/* store a pointer to the reserved memory in R6 */
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+	/* check whether the reservation was successful */
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
+	/* spill R6(mem) into the stack */
+	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+	/* fill it back in R7 */
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+	/* should be able to access *(R7) = 0 */
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, 0, 0),
+	/* submit the reserved ringbuf memory */
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_submit),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+},
 {
 	"check corrupted spill/fill",
 	.insns = {
-- 
2.27.0

Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill

From: Yonghong Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-13 16:06:40


On 1/12/21 9:38 PM, Gilad Reti wrote:
Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted>
I didn't verify result_unpriv = ACCEPT part. I think it is correct
by checking code.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>

Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-14 02:05:58

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:38 AM Gilad Reti [off-list ref] wrote:
Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill

From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-14 02:05:59

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:05 PM Yonghong Song [off-list ref] wrote:


On 1/12/21 9:38 PM, Gilad Reti wrote:
quoted
Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted>
I didn't verify result_unpriv = ACCEPT part. I think it is correct
by checking code.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Thanks for the description!

Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-14 04:03:31

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:29 PM KP Singh [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:38 AM Gilad Reti [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <redacted>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
It's a border line feature vs fix.
Since the patch is trivial and it addresses a real problem I've
applied to the bpf tree.
Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help