[PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

Subsystems: networking drivers, ocelot ethernet switch driver, the rest

STALE2023d

9 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-26 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 04:56:30

There are several error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports().  I
went through the code, and carefully audited it and made fixes and
cleanups.

1) The ocelot_probe_port() function didn't have a mirror release function
   so it was hard to follow.  I created the ocelot_release_port()
   function.
2) In the ocelot_probe_port() function, if the register_netdev() call
   failed, then it lead to a double free_netdev(dev) bug.  Fix this
   by moving the "ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;" assignment to the
   end of the function after everything has succeeded.
3) I was concerned that the "port" which comes from of_property_read_u32()
   might be out of bounds so I added a check for that.
4) In the original code if ocelot_regmap_init() failed then the driver
   tried to continue but I think that should be a fatal error.
5) If ocelot_probe_port() failed then the most recent devlink was leaked.
   Fix this by moving the "registered_ports[port] = true;" assignment
   earlier.
6) The error handling if the final ocelot_port_devlink_init() failed had
   two problems.  The "while (port-- >= 0)" loop should have been
   "--port" pre-op instead of a post-op to avoid a buffer underflow.
   The "if (!registered_ports[port])" condition was reversed leading to
   resource leaks and double frees.

Fixes: 6c30384eb1de ("net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c | 39 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
index 30a38df08a21..2c82ffe2c611 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
@@ -1064,7 +1064,6 @@ static void mscc_ocelot_release_ports(struct ocelot *ocelot)
 	int port;
 
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) {
-		struct ocelot_port_private *priv;
 		struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port;
 
 		ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[port];
@@ -1072,12 +1071,7 @@ static void mscc_ocelot_release_ports(struct ocelot *ocelot)
 			continue;
 
 		ocelot_deinit_port(ocelot, port);
-
-		priv = container_of(ocelot_port, struct ocelot_port_private,
-				    port);
-
-		unregister_netdev(priv->dev);
-		free_netdev(priv->dev);
+		ocelot_release_port(ocelot_port);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1123,14 +1117,22 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			continue;
 
 		port = reg;
+		if (port < 0 || port >= ocelot->num_phys_ports) {
+			dev_err(ocelot->dev,
+				"invalid port number: %d >= %d\n", port,
+				ocelot->num_phys_ports);
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		snprintf(res_name, sizeof(res_name), "port%d", port);
 
 		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
 						   res_name);
 		target = ocelot_regmap_init(ocelot, res);
-		if (IS_ERR(target))
-			continue;
+		if (IS_ERR(target)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(target);
+			goto out_teardown;
+		}
 
 		phy_node = of_parse_phandle(portnp, "phy-handle", 0);
 		if (!phy_node)
@@ -1147,6 +1149,7 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			of_node_put(portnp);
 			goto out_teardown;
 		}
+		registered_ports[port] = true;
 
 		err = ocelot_probe_port(ocelot, port, target, phy);
 		if (err) {
@@ -1154,8 +1157,6 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			goto out_teardown;
 		}
 
-		registered_ports[port] = true;
-
 		ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[port];
 		priv = container_of(ocelot_port, struct ocelot_port_private,
 				    port);
@@ -1213,15 +1214,9 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 		err = ocelot_port_devlink_init(ocelot, port,
 					       DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_UNUSED);
-		if (err) {
-			while (port-- >= 0) {
-				if (!registered_ports[port])
-					continue;
-				ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
-			}
-
+		if (err)
 			goto out_teardown;
-		}
+		registered_ports[port] = true;
 	}
 
 	kfree(registered_ports);
@@ -1233,10 +1228,8 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	mscc_ocelot_release_ports(ocelot);
 	/* Tear down devlink ports for the registered network interfaces */
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) {
-		if (!registered_ports[port])
-			continue;
-
-		ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
+		if (registered_ports[port])
+			ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
 	}
 	kfree(registered_ports);
 	return err;
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error code in mscc_ocelot_probe()

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-01-25 13:26:28

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Probe should return an error code if platform_get_irq_byname() fails
but it returns success instead.

Fixes: 6c30384eb1de ("net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

[PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error code in mscc_ocelot_probe()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-25 14:10:28

Probe should return an error code if platform_get_irq_byname() fails
but it returns success instead.

Fixes: 6c30384eb1de ("net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
index 2c82ffe2c611..7e4c9b255124 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
@@ -1307,8 +1307,10 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto out_free_devlink;
 
 	irq_xtr = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "xtr");
-	if (irq_xtr < 0)
+	if (irq_xtr < 0) {
+		err = irq_xtr;
 		goto out_free_devlink;
+	}
 
 	err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_xtr, NULL,
 					ocelot_xtr_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT,
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-01-25 16:20:29

Hi Dan,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
index 9553eb3e441c..875ab8532d8c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
@@ -1262,7 +1262,6 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	ocelot_port = &priv->port;
 	ocelot_port->ocelot = ocelot;
 	ocelot_port->target = target;
-	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
You cannot remove this from here just like that, because
ocelot_init_port right below accesses ocelot->ports[port], and it will
dereference through a NULL pointer otherwise.
quoted hunk
 	dev->netdev_ops = &ocelot_port_netdev_ops;
 	dev->ethtool_ops = &ocelot_ethtool_ops;
@@ -1282,7 +1281,19 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(ocelot->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
 		free_netdev(dev);
+		return err;
 	}
 
-	return err;
+	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void ocelot_release_port(struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port)
+{
+	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = container_of(ocelot_port,
+						struct ocelot_port_private,
+						port);
Can this assignment please be done separately from the declaration?

	struct ocelot_port_private *priv;

	priv = container_of(ocelot_port, struct ocelot_port_private, port);
+
+	unregister_netdev(priv->dev);
+	free_netdev(priv->dev);
 }
Fun, isn't it? :D
Thanks for taking the time to untangle this.

Additionally, you have changed the meaning of "registered_ports" from
"this port had its net_device registered" to "this port had its
devlink_port registered". This is ok, but I would like the variable
renamed now, too. I think devlink_ports_registered would be ok.

In hindsight, I was foolish for using a heap-allocated boolean array for
registered_ports, because this switch architecture is guaranteed to not
have more than 32 ports, so a u32 bitmask is fine.

If you resend, can you please squash this diff on top of your patch?

-----------------------------[cut here]-----------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
index 1ca531b13497..7b2045707c5a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
@@ -1196,6 +1196,7 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	ocelot_port = &priv->port;
 	ocelot_port->ocelot = ocelot;
 	ocelot_port->target = target;
+	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
 
 	dev->netdev_ops = &ocelot_port_netdev_ops;
 	dev->ethtool_ops = &ocelot_ethtool_ops;
@@ -1215,10 +1216,10 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(ocelot->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
 		free_netdev(dev);
+		ocelot->ports[port] = NULL;
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
index e99b9cdcc4a7..761834466541 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
@@ -939,8 +939,8 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				  struct device_node *ports)
 {
 	struct ocelot *ocelot = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	u32 devlink_ports_registered = 0;
 	struct device_node *portnp;
-	bool *registered_ports;
 	int port, err;
 	u32 reg;
 
@@ -956,11 +956,6 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	if (!ocelot->devlink_ports)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	registered_ports = kcalloc(ocelot->num_phys_ports, sizeof(bool),
-				   GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!registered_ports)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
 	for_each_available_child_of_node(ports, portnp) {
 		struct ocelot_port_private *priv;
 		struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port;
@@ -1009,7 +1004,7 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			of_node_put(portnp);
 			goto out_teardown;
 		}
-		registered_ports[port] = true;
+		devlink_ports_registered |= BIT(port);
 
 		err = ocelot_probe_port(ocelot, port, target, phy);
 		if (err) {
@@ -1069,17 +1064,16 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	/* Initialize unused devlink ports at the end */
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) {
-		if (registered_ports[port])
+		if (devlink_ports_registered & BIT(port))
 			continue;
 
 		err = ocelot_port_devlink_init(ocelot, port,
 					       DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_UNUSED);
 		if (err)
 			goto out_teardown;
-		registered_ports[port] = true;
-	}
 
-	kfree(registered_ports);
+		devlink_ports_registered |= BIT(port);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1088,10 +1082,9 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	mscc_ocelot_release_ports(ocelot);
 	/* Tear down devlink ports for the registered network interfaces */
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) {
-		if (registered_ports[port])
+		if (devlink_ports_registered & BIT(port))
 			ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
 	}
-	kfree(registered_ports);
 	return err;
 }
 
-----------------------------[cut here]-----------------------------
Then you can add:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Also, it's strange but I don't see the v2 patches in patchwork. Did you
send them in-reply-to v1 or something?

Thanks!

Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 04:56:30

Oops.  Please ignore this patch.  Part of it is missing.

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 08:43:55

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:18:07PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
Hi Dan,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
index 9553eb3e441c..875ab8532d8c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
@@ -1262,7 +1262,6 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	ocelot_port = &priv->port;
 	ocelot_port->ocelot = ocelot;
 	ocelot_port->target = target;
-	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
You cannot remove this from here just like that, because
ocelot_init_port right below accesses ocelot->ports[port], and it will
dereference through a NULL pointer otherwise.
Argh...  Thanks for spotting that.
quoted
 	dev->netdev_ops = &ocelot_port_netdev_ops;
 	dev->ethtool_ops = &ocelot_ethtool_ops;
@@ -1282,7 +1281,19 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(ocelot->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
 		free_netdev(dev);
+		return err;
 	}
 
-	return err;
+	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void ocelot_release_port(struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port)
+{
+	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = container_of(ocelot_port,
+						struct ocelot_port_private,
+						port);
Can this assignment please be done separately from the declaration?

	struct ocelot_port_private *priv;

	priv = container_of(ocelot_port, struct ocelot_port_private, port);
quoted
+
+	unregister_netdev(priv->dev);
+	free_netdev(priv->dev);
 }
Fun, isn't it? :D
Thanks for taking the time to untangle this.

Additionally, you have changed the meaning of "registered_ports" from
"this port had its net_device registered" to "this port had its
devlink_port registered". This is ok, but I would like the variable
renamed now, too. I think devlink_ports_registered would be ok.

In hindsight, I was foolish for using a heap-allocated boolean array for
registered_ports, because this switch architecture is guaranteed to not
have more than 32 ports, so a u32 bitmask is fine.

If you resend, can you please squash this diff on top of your patch?
Yep.  I will resend.  Thanks for basically writing v2 for me.  Your
review comments were very clear but code is always 100% clear so that's
really great.  I've never seen anyone do that before.  I should copy
that for my own reviews and hopefully it's a new trend.
Then you can add:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Also, it's strange but I don't see the v2 patches in patchwork. Did you
send them in-reply-to v1 or something?
I did send them as a reply to v1.  Patchwork doesn't like that?

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-01-26 08:53:43

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:27:53AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted
If you resend, can you please squash this diff on top of your patch?
Yep.  I will resend.  Thanks for basically writing v2 for me.  Your
review comments were very clear but code is always 100% clear so that's
really great.
Until the code is wrong :)
I've never seen anyone do that before.  I should copy
that for my own reviews and hopefully it's a new trend.
I took that from Florian, it was helpful to me when I wasn't minding my
own business and touching code I couldn't test:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20201218223852.2717102-4-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/#23858835
quoted
Also, it's strange but I don't see the v2 patches in patchwork. Did you
send them in-reply-to v1 or something?
I did send them as a reply to v1.  Patchwork doesn't like that?
Nope.

[PATCH v2 2/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error code in mscc_ocelot_probe()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 20:42:58

Probe should return an error code if platform_get_irq_byname() fails
but it returns success instead.

Fixes: 6c30384eb1de ("net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
v2: no change

 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
index 2c82ffe2c611..7e4c9b255124 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
@@ -1307,8 +1307,10 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto out_free_devlink;
 
 	irq_xtr = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "xtr");
-	if (irq_xtr < 0)
+	if (irq_xtr < 0) {
+		err = irq_xtr;
 		goto out_free_devlink;
+	}
 
 	err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_xtr, NULL,
 					ocelot_xtr_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT,
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH v2 1/2 net-next] net: mscc: ocelot: fix error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 21:28:11

There are several error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports().  I
went through the code, and carefully audited it and made fixes and
cleanups.

1) The ocelot_probe_port() function didn't have a mirror release function
   so it was hard to follow.  I created the ocelot_release_port()
   function.
2) In the ocelot_probe_port() function, if the register_netdev() call
   failed, then it lead to a double free_netdev(dev) bug.  Fix this
   by moving the "ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;" assignment to the
   end of the function after everything has succeeded.
3) I was concerned that the "port" which comes from of_property_read_u32()
   might be out of bounds so I added a check for that.
4) In the original code if ocelot_regmap_init() failed then the driver
   tried to continue but I think that should be a fatal error.
5) If ocelot_probe_port() failed then the most recent devlink was leaked.
   Fix this by moving the "registered_ports[port] = true;" assignment
   earlier.
6) The error handling if the final ocelot_port_devlink_init() failed had
   two problems.  The "while (port-- >= 0)" loop should have been
   "--port" pre-op instead of a post-op to avoid a buffer underflow.
   The "if (!registered_ports[port])" condition was reversed leading to
   resource leaks and double frees.

Fixes: 6c30384eb1de ("net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
v2: In v1, I accidentally left out parts of the commit so it didn't
compile.

 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.h         |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c     | 15 +++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c | 39 +++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.h
index e8621dbc14f7..76b8d8ce3b48 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.h
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ void ocelot_port_writel(struct ocelot_port *port, u32 val, u32 reg);
 
 int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 		      struct phy_device *phy);
+void ocelot_release_port(struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port);
 int ocelot_devlink_init(struct ocelot *ocelot);
 void ocelot_devlink_teardown(struct ocelot *ocelot);
 int ocelot_port_devlink_init(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
index 9553eb3e441c..875ab8532d8c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
@@ -1262,7 +1262,6 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	ocelot_port = &priv->port;
 	ocelot_port->ocelot = ocelot;
 	ocelot_port->target = target;
-	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
 
 	dev->netdev_ops = &ocelot_port_netdev_ops;
 	dev->ethtool_ops = &ocelot_ethtool_ops;
@@ -1282,7 +1281,19 @@ int ocelot_probe_port(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, struct regmap *target,
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(ocelot->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
 		free_netdev(dev);
+		return err;
 	}
 
-	return err;
+	ocelot->ports[port] = ocelot_port;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void ocelot_release_port(struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port)
+{
+	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = container_of(ocelot_port,
+						struct ocelot_port_private,
+						port);
+
+	unregister_netdev(priv->dev);
+	free_netdev(priv->dev);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
index 30a38df08a21..2c82ffe2c611 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
@@ -1064,7 +1064,6 @@ static void mscc_ocelot_release_ports(struct ocelot *ocelot)
 	int port;
 
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) {
-		struct ocelot_port_private *priv;
 		struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port;
 
 		ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[port];
@@ -1072,12 +1071,7 @@ static void mscc_ocelot_release_ports(struct ocelot *ocelot)
 			continue;
 
 		ocelot_deinit_port(ocelot, port);
-
-		priv = container_of(ocelot_port, struct ocelot_port_private,
-				    port);
-
-		unregister_netdev(priv->dev);
-		free_netdev(priv->dev);
+		ocelot_release_port(ocelot_port);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1123,14 +1117,22 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			continue;
 
 		port = reg;
+		if (port < 0 || port >= ocelot->num_phys_ports) {
+			dev_err(ocelot->dev,
+				"invalid port number: %d >= %d\n", port,
+				ocelot->num_phys_ports);
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		snprintf(res_name, sizeof(res_name), "port%d", port);
 
 		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
 						   res_name);
 		target = ocelot_regmap_init(ocelot, res);
-		if (IS_ERR(target))
-			continue;
+		if (IS_ERR(target)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(target);
+			goto out_teardown;
+		}
 
 		phy_node = of_parse_phandle(portnp, "phy-handle", 0);
 		if (!phy_node)
@@ -1147,6 +1149,7 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			of_node_put(portnp);
 			goto out_teardown;
 		}
+		registered_ports[port] = true;
 
 		err = ocelot_probe_port(ocelot, port, target, phy);
 		if (err) {
@@ -1154,8 +1157,6 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			goto out_teardown;
 		}
 
-		registered_ports[port] = true;
-
 		ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[port];
 		priv = container_of(ocelot_port, struct ocelot_port_private,
 				    port);
@@ -1213,15 +1214,9 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 		err = ocelot_port_devlink_init(ocelot, port,
 					       DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_UNUSED);
-		if (err) {
-			while (port-- >= 0) {
-				if (!registered_ports[port])
-					continue;
-				ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
-			}
-
+		if (err)
 			goto out_teardown;
-		}
+		registered_ports[port] = true;
 	}
 
 	kfree(registered_ports);
@@ -1233,10 +1228,8 @@ static int mscc_ocelot_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	mscc_ocelot_release_ports(ocelot);
 	/* Tear down devlink ports for the registered network interfaces */
 	for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++) {
-		if (!registered_ports[port])
-			continue;
-
-		ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
+		if (registered_ports[port])
+			ocelot_port_devlink_teardown(ocelot, port);
 	}
 	kfree(registered_ports);
 	return err;
-- 
2.29.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help