From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Date: 2021-01-20 13:46:28
Team driver protects port list traversal by its team->lock mutex
in functions like team_change_mtu(), team_set_rx_mode(),
team_vlan_rx_{add,del}_vid() etc.
These functions call appropriate callbacks of all enslaved
devices. Some drivers need to update their features under
certain conditions (e.g. TSO is broken for jumbo frames etc.) so
they call netdev_update_features(). This causes a deadlock because
netdev_update_features() calls netdevice notifiers and one of them
is team_device_event() that in case of NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE tries lock
team->lock mutex again.
Example (r8169 case):
...
[ 6391.348202] __mutex_lock.isra.6+0x2d0/0x4a0
[ 6391.358602] team_device_event+0x9d/0x160 [team]
[ 6391.363756] notifier_call_chain+0x47/0x70
[ 6391.368329] netdev_update_features+0x56/0x60
[ 6391.373207] rtl8169_change_mtu+0x14/0x50 [r8169]
[ 6391.378457] dev_set_mtu_ext+0xe1/0x1d0
[ 6391.387022] dev_set_mtu+0x52/0x90
[ 6391.390820] team_change_mtu+0x64/0xf0 [team]
[ 6391.395683] dev_set_mtu_ext+0xe1/0x1d0
[ 6391.399963] do_setlink+0x231/0xf50
...
To fix the problem __team_compute_features() needs to be postponed
for these cases.
Fixes: 3d249d4ca7d0 ("net: introduce ethernet teaming device")
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/team/team.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/if_team.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct team {boolqueue_override_enabled;structlist_head*qom_lists;/* array of queue override mapping lists */boolport_mtu_change_allowed;+structwork_structcompute_features_task;struct{unsignedintcount;unsignedintinterval;/* in ms */
Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 01:23:54PM CET, ivecera@redhat.com wrote:
Team driver protects port list traversal by its team->lock mutex
in functions like team_change_mtu(), team_set_rx_mode(),
team_vlan_rx_{add,del}_vid() etc.
These functions call appropriate callbacks of all enslaved
devices. Some drivers need to update their features under
certain conditions (e.g. TSO is broken for jumbo frames etc.) so
they call netdev_update_features(). This causes a deadlock because
netdev_update_features() calls netdevice notifiers and one of them
is team_device_event() that in case of NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE tries lock
team->lock mutex again.
Example (r8169 case):
...
[ 6391.348202] __mutex_lock.isra.6+0x2d0/0x4a0
[ 6391.358602] team_device_event+0x9d/0x160 [team]
[ 6391.363756] notifier_call_chain+0x47/0x70
[ 6391.368329] netdev_update_features+0x56/0x60
[ 6391.373207] rtl8169_change_mtu+0x14/0x50 [r8169]
[ 6391.378457] dev_set_mtu_ext+0xe1/0x1d0
[ 6391.387022] dev_set_mtu+0x52/0x90
[ 6391.390820] team_change_mtu+0x64/0xf0 [team]
[ 6391.395683] dev_set_mtu_ext+0xe1/0x1d0
[ 6391.399963] do_setlink+0x231/0xf50
...
To fix the problem __team_compute_features() needs to be postponed
for these cases.
Fixes: 3d249d4ca7d0 ("net: introduce ethernet teaming device")
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Date: 2021-01-22 02:39:02
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:29:37 +0100 Ivan Vecera wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:18:20 -0800
Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:56 AM Ivan Vecera [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Team driver protects port list traversal by its team->lock mutex
in functions like team_change_mtu(), team_set_rx_mode(),
The set_rx_mode part can't be true, set_rx_mode can't sleep and
team->lock is a mutex.
quoted
quoted
To fix the problem __team_compute_features() needs to be postponed
for these cases.
Is there any user-visible effect after deferring this feature change?
An user should not notice this change.
I think Cong is right, can you expand a little on your assertion?
User should be able to assume that the moment syscall returns the
features had settled.
What does team->mutex actually protect in team_compute_features()?
All callers seem to hold RTNL at a quick glance. This is a bit of
a long shot but isn't it just tryin to protect the iteration over
ports which could be under RCU?
More crude idea would be to wrap the mutex_unlock(&team->lock) into
a helper which checks if something tried to change features while it
was locked. rtnl_unlock()-style.
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Date: 2021-01-22 08:39:12
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:34:52 -0800
Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:29:37 +0100 Ivan Vecera wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:18:20 -0800
Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:56 AM Ivan Vecera [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Team driver protects port list traversal by its team->lock mutex
in functions like team_change_mtu(), team_set_rx_mode(),
The set_rx_mode part can't be true, set_rx_mode can't sleep and
team->lock is a mutex.
quoted
quoted
quoted
To fix the problem __team_compute_features() needs to be postponed
for these cases.
Is there any user-visible effect after deferring this feature change?
An user should not notice this change.
I think Cong is right, can you expand a little on your assertion?
User should be able to assume that the moment syscall returns the
features had settled.
What does team->mutex actually protect in team_compute_features()?
All callers seem to hold RTNL at a quick glance. This is a bit of
a long shot but isn't it just tryin to protect the iteration over
ports which could be under RCU?
In fact the mutex could be removed at all because all port-list
writers are running under rtnl_lock, some readers like team_change_mtu()
or team_device_event() [notifier] as well and hot path readers are
protected by RCU.
I have discussed this with Jiri but he don't want to introduce any dependency
on RTNL to team as it was designed as RTNL-independent from beginning.
Anyway your idea to run team_compute_features under RCU could be fine
as subsequent __team_compute_features() cannot sleep...
Do you mean something like this?
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Date: 2021-01-22 18:05:52
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:30:27 +0100 Ivan Vecera wrote:
quoted hunk
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:34:52 -0800
Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:29:37 +0100 Ivan Vecera wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:18:20 -0800
Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:56 AM Ivan Vecera [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Team driver protects port list traversal by its team->lock mutex
in functions like team_change_mtu(), team_set_rx_mode(),
The set_rx_mode part can't be true, set_rx_mode can't sleep and
team->lock is a mutex.
quoted
quoted
quoted
To fix the problem __team_compute_features() needs to be postponed
for these cases.
Is there any user-visible effect after deferring this feature change?
An user should not notice this change.
I think Cong is right, can you expand a little on your assertion?
User should be able to assume that the moment syscall returns the
features had settled.
What does team->mutex actually protect in team_compute_features()?
All callers seem to hold RTNL at a quick glance. This is a bit of
a long shot but isn't it just tryin to protect the iteration over
ports which could be under RCU?
In fact the mutex could be removed at all because all port-list
writers are running under rtnl_lock, some readers like team_change_mtu()
or team_device_event() [notifier] as well and hot path readers are
protected by RCU.
I have discussed this with Jiri but he don't want to introduce any dependency
on RTNL to team as it was designed as RTNL-independent from beginning.
Anyway your idea to run team_compute_features under RCU could be fine
as subsequent __team_compute_features() cannot sleep...
Do you mean something like this?
@@ -992,7 +992,8 @@ static void __team_compute_features(struct team *team)unsignedintdst_release_flag=IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE|IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE_PERM;-list_for_each_entry(port,&team->port_list,list){+rcu_read_lock();+list_for_each_entry_rcu(port,&team->port_list,list){vlan_features=netdev_increment_features(vlan_features,port->dev->vlan_features,TEAM_VLAN_FEATURES);
@@ -1006,6 +1007,7 @@ static void __team_compute_features(struct team *team)if(port->dev->hard_header_len>max_hard_header_len)max_hard_header_len=port->dev->hard_header_len;}+rcu_read_unlock();team->dev->vlan_features=vlan_features;team->dev->hw_enc_features=enc_features|NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL|
@@ -1020,9 +1022,7 @@ static void __team_compute_features(struct team *team)staticvoidteam_compute_features(structteam*team){-mutex_lock(&team->lock);__team_compute_features(team);-mutex_unlock(&team->lock);netdev_change_features(team->dev);}
Yup, like this, but if Jiri doesn't like it then I guess we need to
come up with something else?
How about doing the work on unlock? Have some bit set when we had to
defer and then run __team_compute_features() before releasing the lock
for real?