[PATCH] net: sched: fix misspellings using misspell-fixer tool

From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

Some typos are found out by misspell-fixer tool:

$ misspell-fixer -rnv ./net/sched/
./net/sched/act_api.c:686
./net/sched/act_bpf.c:68
./net/sched/cls_rsvp.h:241
./net/sched/em_cmp.c:44
./net/sched/sch_pie.c:408

Fix typos found by misspell-fixer.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>
---
 net/sched/act_api.c  | 2 +-
 net/sched/act_bpf.c  | 2 +-
 net/sched/cls_rsvp.h | 2 +-
 net/sched/em_cmp.c   | 2 +-
 net/sched/sch_pie.c  | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index 1341c59c2f40..60e1572ba606 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c

@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static struct tc_action_ops *tc_lookup_action(struct nlattr *kind)
 	return res;
 }
 
-/*TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO is 32, there count upto 32 */
+/*TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO is 32, there count up to 32 */
 #define TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO_MASK 0x1FF
 int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action **actions,
 		    int nr_actions, struct tcf_result *res)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_bpf.c b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
index a4c7ba35a343..e48e980c3b93 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_bpf.c

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int tcf_bpf_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *act,
 	 * In case a different well-known TC_ACT opcode has been
 	 * returned, it will overwrite the default one.
 	 *
-	 * For everything else that is unkown, TC_ACT_UNSPEC is
+	 * For everything else that is unknown, TC_ACT_UNSPEC is
 	 * returned.
 	 */
 	switch (filter_res) {

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h b/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h
index d36949d9382c..2e288f88ff02 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h
+++ b/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h

@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void rsvp_replace(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct rsvp_filter *n, u32 h)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Something went wrong if we are trying to replace a non-existant
+	/* Something went wrong if we are trying to replace a non-existent
 	 * node. Mind as well halt instead of silently failing.
 	 */
 	BUG_ON(1);

diff --git a/net/sched/em_cmp.c b/net/sched/em_cmp.c
index a4d09b1fb66a..f17b049ea530 100644
--- a/net/sched/em_cmp.c
+++ b/net/sched/em_cmp.c

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int em_cmp_match(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_ematch *em,
 		break;
 
 	case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U32:
-		/* Worth checking boundries? The branching seems
+		/* Worth checking boundaries? The branching seems
 		 * to get worse. Visit again.
 		 */
 		val = get_unaligned_be32(ptr);

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_pie.c b/net/sched/sch_pie.c
index c65077f0c0f3..5a457ff61acd 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_pie.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_pie.c

@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ void pie_calculate_probability(struct pie_params *params, struct pie_vars *vars,
 	/* We restart the measurement cycle if the following conditions are met
 	 * 1. If the delay has been low for 2 consecutive Tupdate periods
 	 * 2. Calculated drop probability is zero
-	 * 3. If average dq_rate_estimator is enabled, we have atleast one
+	 * 3. If average dq_rate_estimator is enabled, we have at least one
 	 *    estimate for the avg_dq_rate ie., is a non-zero value
 	 */
 	if ((vars->qdelay < params->target / 2) &&

-- 
2.25.1

menglong8.dong@ wrote:

From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

Some typos are found out by misspell-fixer tool:

$ misspell-fixer -rnv ./net/sched/
./net/sched/act_api.c:686
./net/sched/act_bpf.c:68
./net/sched/cls_rsvp.h:241
./net/sched/em_cmp.c:44
./net/sched/sch_pie.c:408

Fix typos found by misspell-fixer.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>
---

Hi, you will want to add net-next to the [PATCH *] line next time
to make it clear this is for net-next. The contents make it
obvious in this case though.

Also I'm not sure why the bpf@ include but OK.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Hi, John.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:23 AM John Fastabend [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi, you will want to add net-next to the [PATCH *] line next time
to make it clear this is for net-next. The contents make it
obvious in this case though.

Also I'm not sure why the bpf@ include but OK.

Thanks for your suggestion, and I will pay attention to the [PATCH *] next time.

As for the bpf@, I guess that 'get_maintainer.pl' listed it to me
because of 'act_bpf.c'.

Cheers,
Menglong Dong

On Mon,  9 Nov 2020 02:02:17 -0500 menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:

From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

Some typos are found out by misspell-fixer tool:

$ misspell-fixer -rnv ./net/sched/
./net/sched/act_api.c:686
./net/sched/act_bpf.c:68
./net/sched/cls_rsvp.h:241
./net/sched/em_cmp.c:44
./net/sched/sch_pie.c:408

Fix typos found by misspell-fixer.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>

Applied, thanks.