On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 17:08:25 +0100 Dominique Martinet wrote:

Andrew Lunn wrote on Sun, Nov 01, 2020:

quoted

quoted

quoted

Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>  

Acked-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>

quoted

quoted

Thanks, LGTM I'll take this for next cycle unless someone is grabbing
these  

I hope to turn on W=1 by default soon in most of /net. That patch is
likely to go to net-next.  

That would be nice!

quoted

What route do your patches normally take to Linus? Do you send a pull
request to net-next? Or straight to Linus?  

I normally send pull requests straight to Linus (because I also have
fs/9p which isn't part of net/) ; but since it's really low volume I
don't like bugging him everytime for such churn and am not really sure
what to do -- that's why I asked :)

quoted

If this patch is not in net-next, i cannot enable it for 9p. So
either:
[...]
4) Jakub takes this patch into net-next, and i can then enable W=1 in
   9p along with all the other sub-directories. We will get to know
   about new warnings in net-next, and next, but not in your tree.  

Developers should use next for development anyway; I think that's the
easiest way forward if you want to enable W=1 ASAP.

I mean, if I take the patch the fixes will get in next in the next few
days sure but it'll make enabling W=1 difficult for the net-next tree
without it.
I've added Jakub to direct recipients, could you take this one?

Sure - to net-next it goes, thanks!