# Re: \[PATCH v2 20/20\] ppc: propagate the calling conventions change down to csum\_partial\_copy\_generic()

- From: Al Viro \<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk\>
- Date: 2020-10-15 01:40:30 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2020/10/6140277
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arch/2020/07/6045137/t/2.md

```text
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 03:51:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 3:27 PM Jason A. Donenfeld [ref] wrote:
> >
> > This patch is causing crashes in WireGuard's CI over at
> > https://www.wireguard.com/build-status/ . Apparently sending a simple
> > network packet winds up triggering refcount_t's warn-on-saturate code. I
> 
> Ouch.
> 
> The C parts look fairly straightforward, and I don't see how they
> could cause that odd refcount issue.
> 
> So I assume it's the low-level asm code conversion that is buggy. And
> it's apparently the 32-bit conversion, since your ppc64 status looks
> fine.
> 
> I think it's this instruction:
> 
>         addi    r1,r1,16
> 
> that should be removed from the function exit, because Al removed the
> 
> -       stwu    r1,-16(r1)
> 
> on function entry.
> 
> So I think you end up with a corrupt stack pointer and basically
> random behavior.

Gyahh...  ACK, and I really wonder how the hell has it managed to avoid
crashing on testing.

Mea culpa, folks.
```