Re: [PATCH] [v2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi devices
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2020-09-30 10:12:04
2 messages, 2 authors, 2020-09-30 · open the first message on its own page
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2020-09-30 10:12:04
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 12:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:01:27AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:quoted
Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfigb/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfigquoted
new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ff05eaf0a8d4--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +config WLAN_VENDOR_PURELIFI + bool "pureLiFi devices" + default y"N" is preferred default.In most cases that's true, but for WLAN_VENDOR_ configs 'default y' should be used. It's the same as with NET_VENDOR_.I would like to challenge it, why is that? Why do I need to set "N", every time new vendor upstreams its code?
You don't. The WLAN_VENDOR_* settings are not supposed to affect the build, just the Kconfig visibility. johannes
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-09-30 10:45:06
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:11:24PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 12:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:quoted
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:01:27AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:quoted
Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfigb/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfigquoted
new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ff05eaf0a8d4--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +config WLAN_VENDOR_PURELIFI + bool "pureLiFi devices" + default y"N" is preferred default.In most cases that's true, but for WLAN_VENDOR_ configs 'default y' should be used. It's the same as with NET_VENDOR_.I would like to challenge it, why is that? Why do I need to set "N", every time new vendor upstreams its code?You don't. The WLAN_VENDOR_* settings are not supposed to affect the build, just the Kconfig visibility.
Which is important to me, I'm keeping .config as minimal as possible to simplify comparison between various builds. Thanks