Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtlwifi: Remove unnecessary parenthese in rtl_dbg uses

2 messages, 2 authors, 2020-08-27 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtlwifi: Remove unnecessary parenthese in rtl_dbg uses

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-27 09:27:47

Larry Finger [off-list ref] writes:
On 7/27/20 9:52 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 09:04 +0000, Pkshih wrote:
quoted
So, I think you would like to have parenthesis intentionally.
If so,
test1 ? : (test2 ? :)
would be better.


If not,
test1 ? : test2 ? :
may be what you want (without any parenthesis).
Use whatever style you like, it's unimportant to me
and it's not worth spending any real time on it.
If you are so busy, why did you jump in with patches that you knew I
was already working on? You knew because you critiqued my first
submission.
Yeah, I don't understand this either. First stepping on Larry's work and
when after getting review comments claiming being busy and not caring is
contradicting.
@Kalle: Please drop my contributions in the sequence "PATCH v2 00/15]
rtlwifi: Change RT_TRACE into rtl_dbg for all drivers".
Is there a technical reason for that? I prefer that patchset more,
nicely split in smaller patches and it's fully available from patchwork.

Patch 15 had a build problem but I can drop that for now, it can be
resent separately:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11681621/

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtlwifi: Remove unnecessary parenthese in rtl_dbg uses

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2020-08-27 11:09:15

On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 12:27 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
Larry Finger [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On 7/27/20 9:52 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 09:04 +0000, Pkshih wrote:
quoted
So, I think you would like to have parenthesis intentionally.
If so,
test1 ? : (test2 ? :)
would be better.


If not,
test1 ? : test2 ? :
may be what you want (without any parenthesis).
Use whatever style you like, it's unimportant to me
and it's not worth spending any real time on it.
If you are so busy, why did you jump in with patches that you knew I
was already working on? You knew because you critiqued my first
submission.
Yeah, I don't understand this either. First stepping on Larry's work and
when after getting review comments claiming being busy and not caring is
contradicting.
I didn't say I was busy, I said I didn't care.

And it's not stepping on anyone's work, it's
a trivial contribution.  Take it or not.
It's been months btw, the pace of the work isn't
particularly fast here.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help