linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

4 messages, 2 authors, 2020-04-16 · open the first message on its own page

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-10 10:01:39

Hi all,

Commits

  b63293e759a1 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx network flow classification rules on ul rep")
  6783e8b29f63 ("net/mlx5e: Init ethtool steering for representors")
  01013ad355d6 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx flow indir table and RSS hash key on ul rep")

are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

From: Saeed Mahameed <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-10 23:57:37

On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 21:01 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Commits

  b63293e759a1 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx network flow classification
rules on ul rep")
  6783e8b29f63 ("net/mlx5e: Init ethtool steering for representors")
  01013ad355d6 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx flow indir table and RSS hash
key on ul rep")
Hi Stephen, 

checkpatch doesn't seem to catch such problems.. 

I count on our CI to do such checks for me, so instead of me writing a 
new script every time we hit a new unforeseen issue, i was wondering
where can i find the set of test/scripts you are running ? 
are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-13 00:05:39

Hi Saeed,

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:57:31 +0000 Saeed Mahameed [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 21:01 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Commits

  b63293e759a1 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx network flow classification
rules on ul rep")
  6783e8b29f63 ("net/mlx5e: Init ethtool steering for representors")
  01013ad355d6 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx flow indir table and RSS hash
key on ul rep")
  
Hi Stephen, 

checkpatch doesn't seem to catch such problems.. 

I count on our CI to do such checks for me, so instead of me writing a 
new script every time we hit a new unforeseen issue, i was wondering
where can i find the set of test/scripts you are running ? 
I have attached my scripts ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

From: Saeed Mahameed <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-16 01:58:52

On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 10:05 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Saeed,

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:57:31 +0000 Saeed Mahameed <
saeedm@mellanox.com> wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 21:01 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Commits

  b63293e759a1 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx network flow
classification
rules on ul rep")
  6783e8b29f63 ("net/mlx5e: Init ethtool steering for
representors")
  01013ad355d6 ("net/mlx5e: Show/set Rx flow indir table and RSS
hash
key on ul rep")
  
Hi Stephen, 

checkpatch doesn't seem to catch such problems.. 

I count on our CI to do such checks for me, so instead of me
writing a 
new script every time we hit a new unforeseen issue, i was
wondering
where can i find the set of test/scripts you are running ? 
I have attached my scripts ...
Thanks Stephen ! much appreciated.

Saeed.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help