Doing so, we save one call to get data we already have in the struct.
Also, since there is no guarantee that getname use sockaddr_ll
parameter beyond its size, we add a little bit of security here.
It should do not do beyond MAX_ADDR_LEN, but syzbot found that
ax25_getname writes more (72 bytes, the size of full_sockaddr_ax25,
versus 20 + 32 bytes of sockaddr_ll + MAX_ADDR_LEN in syzbot repro).
Fixes: 3a4d5c94e9593 ("vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server")
Reported-by: syzbot+f2a62d07a5198c819c7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Date: 2020-02-21 11:11:39
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:06:56PM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
Doing so, we save one call to get data we already have in the struct.
Also, since there is no guarantee that getname use sockaddr_ll
parameter beyond its size, we add a little bit of security here.
It should do not do beyond MAX_ADDR_LEN, but syzbot found that
ax25_getname writes more (72 bytes, the size of full_sockaddr_ax25,
versus 20 + 32 bytes of sockaddr_ll + MAX_ADDR_LEN in syzbot repro).
Fixes: 3a4d5c94e9593 ("vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server")
Reported-by: syzbot+f2a62d07a5198c819c7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Thanks for debugging this!
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Doing so, we save one call to get data we already have in the struct.
Also, since there is no guarantee that getname use sockaddr_ll
parameter beyond its size, we add a little bit of security here.
It should do not do beyond MAX_ADDR_LEN, but syzbot found that
ax25_getname writes more (72 bytes, the size of full_sockaddr_ax25,
versus 20 + 32 bytes of sockaddr_ll + MAX_ADDR_LEN in syzbot repro).
Fixes: 3a4d5c94e9593 ("vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server")
Reported-by: syzbot+f2a62d07a5198c819c7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>