Re: [PATCH net] net: thunderx: workaround BGX TX Underflow issue
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Date: 2020-01-30 19:16:37
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:10:55AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:36:09 -0800, Robert Jones wrote:quoted
From: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> While it is not yet understood why a TX underflow can easily occur for SGMII interfaces resulting in a TX wedge. It has been found that disabling/re-enabling the LMAC resolves the issue. Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Jones <redacted>Sunil or Robert (i.e. one of the maintainers) will have to review this patch (as indicated by Dave by marking it with "Needs Review / ACK" in patchwork). At a quick look there are some things which jump out at me:quoted
+static int bgx_register_intr(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct bgx *bgx = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int num_vec, ret; + + /* Enable MSI-X */ + num_vec = pci_msix_vec_count(pdev); + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, num_vec, num_vec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Req for #%d msix vectors failed\n", num_vec); + return 1;Please propagate real error codes, or make this function void as the caller never actually checks the return value.quoted
+ } + sprintf(bgx->irq_name, "BGX%d", bgx->bgx_id);
Another quick look: use snprintf so that you won't overflow the bgx->irq_name in case bgx->bgx_id has some weird big number.
quoted
+ ret = request_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, GMPX_GMI_TX_INT),There is a alloc_irq and request_irq call added in this patch but there is never any freeing. Are you sure this is fine? Devices can be reprobed (unbound and bound to drivers via sysfs).quoted
+ bgx_intr_handler, 0, bgx->irq_name, bgx);Please align the continuation line with the opening bracket (checkpatch --strict should help catch this).quoted
+ if (ret) + return 1; + + return 0; +}