From: Michal Kubecek <hidden> Date: 2019-10-09 16:44:36
Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().
Fixes: c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing to a separate function")
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <redacted>
---
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().
This is the original code before the changes:
if (ops->doit == NULL)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (family->maxattr && family->parallel_ops) {
attrbuf = kmalloc_array(family->maxattr + 1,
sizeof(struct nlattr *),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (attrbuf == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
} else
attrbuf = family->attrbuf;
if (attrbuf) {
enum netlink_validation validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT;
if (ops->validate & GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT)
validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL;
err = __nlmsg_parse(nlh, hdrlen, attrbuf, family->maxattr,
family->policy, validate, extack);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
}
Looks like the __nlmsg_parse() is called no matter if maxattr if 0 or
not. It is only considered for allocation of attrbuf. This is in-sync
with the current code.
For dumpit, the check was there:
if (family->maxattr) {
unsigned int validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT;
if (ops->validate &
GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP_STRICT)
validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL;
rc = __nla_validate(nlmsg_attrdata(nlh, hdrlen),
nlmsg_attrlen(nlh, hdrlen),
family->maxattr,
family->policy,
validate, extack);
if (rc)
return rc;
}
quoted hunk
Fixes: c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing to a separate function")
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <redacted>
---
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Michal Kubecek <hidden> Date: 2019-10-10 09:13:52
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:39:58AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
quoted
Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().
This is the original code before the changes:
if (ops->doit == NULL)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (family->maxattr && family->parallel_ops) {
attrbuf = kmalloc_array(family->maxattr + 1,
sizeof(struct nlattr *),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (attrbuf == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
} else
attrbuf = family->attrbuf;
if (attrbuf) {
enum netlink_validation validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT;
if (ops->validate & GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT)
validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL;
err = __nlmsg_parse(nlh, hdrlen, attrbuf, family->maxattr,
family->policy, validate, extack);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
}
Looks like the __nlmsg_parse() is called no matter if maxattr if 0 or
not. It is only considered for allocation of attrbuf. This is in-sync
with the current code.
If family->maxattr is 0, genl_register_family() sets family->attrbuf to
NULL so that attrbuf is also NULL and the whole "if (attrbuf) { ... }"
block is not executed.
Michal
Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:13:47AM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:39:58AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
quoted
Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().
This is the original code before the changes:
if (ops->doit == NULL)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (family->maxattr && family->parallel_ops) {
attrbuf = kmalloc_array(family->maxattr + 1,
sizeof(struct nlattr *),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (attrbuf == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
} else
attrbuf = family->attrbuf;
if (attrbuf) {
enum netlink_validation validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT;
if (ops->validate & GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT)
validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL;
err = __nlmsg_parse(nlh, hdrlen, attrbuf, family->maxattr,
family->policy, validate, extack);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
}
Looks like the __nlmsg_parse() is called no matter if maxattr if 0 or
not. It is only considered for allocation of attrbuf. This is in-sync
with the current code.
If family->maxattr is 0, genl_register_family() sets family->attrbuf to
NULL so that attrbuf is also NULL and the whole "if (attrbuf) { ... }"
block is not executed.
Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
quoted hunk
Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().
Fixes: c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing to a separate function")
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <redacted>
---
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Michal Kubecek <hidden> Date: 2019-10-10 10:45:48
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:31:53AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@suse.cz wrote:
quoted
Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().
Fixes: c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing to a separate function")
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <redacted>
---
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)