[PATCH net-next] mvpp2: remove misleading comment
From: Matteo Croce <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-02 21:49:23
Recycling in mvpp2 has gone long time ago, but two comment still refers
to it. Remove those two misleading comments as they generate confusion.
Fixes: 7ef7e1d949cd ("net: mvpp2: drop useless fields in mvpp2_bm_pool and related code")
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
index 111b3b8239e1..5fea65256b9d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c@@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ static void mvpp2_rx_csum(struct mvpp2_port *port, u32 status, skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE; } -/* Reuse skb if possible, or allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */ +/* Allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */ static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct mvpp2_bm_pool *bm_pool, int pool) {
@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port, phys_addr_t phys_addr; void *buf; - /* No recycle or too many buffers are in use, so allocate a new skb */ buf = mvpp2_buf_alloc(port, bm_pool, &dma_addr, &phys_addr, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!buf)
--
2.21.0