From: Rundong Ge <hidden> Date: 2019-07-30 12:25:41
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
With netfilter defragmentation/conntrack enabled, fragmented
packets from A will be defragmented in prerouting, and refragmented
at postrouting.
But in this scenario the bridge found the frag_max_size(1500) is
larger than the dst mtu stored in the fake_rtable whitch is
always equal to the bridge's mtu 1300, then packets will be dopped.
This modifies ip_skb_dst_mtu to use the out dev's mtu instead
of bridge's mtu in bridge refragment.
Signed-off-by: Rundong Ge <redacted>
---
include/net/ip.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
How can a bridge forward a frame from A/B to mtu1300?
With netfilter defragmentation/conntrack enabled, fragmented
packets from A will be defragmented in prerouting, and refragmented
at postrouting.
Yes, but I don't see how that relates to the problem at hand.
But in this scenario the bridge found the frag_max_size(1500) is
larger than the dst mtu stored in the fake_rtable whitch is
always equal to the bridge's mtu 1300, then packets will be dopped.
What happens without netfilter or non-fragmented packets?
This modifies ip_skb_dst_mtu to use the out dev's mtu instead
of bridge's mtu in bridge refragment.
It seems quite a hack? The above setup should use a router, not a bridge.
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <hidden> Date: 2019-07-30 12:41:30
On 30/07/2019 15:25, Rundong Ge wrote:
quoted hunk
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
With netfilter defragmentation/conntrack enabled, fragmented
packets from A will be defragmented in prerouting, and refragmented
at postrouting.
But in this scenario the bridge found the frag_max_size(1500) is
larger than the dst mtu stored in the fake_rtable whitch is
always equal to the bridge's mtu 1300, then packets will be dopped.
This modifies ip_skb_dst_mtu to use the out dev's mtu instead
of bridge's mtu in bridge refragment.
Signed-off-by: Rundong Ge <redacted>
---
include/net/ip.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I don't think this is correct, there's a reason why the bridge chooses the smallest
possible MTU out of its members and this is simply a hack to circumvent it.
If you really like to do so just set the bridge MTU manually, we've added support
so it won't change automatically to the smallest, but then how do you pass packets
1500 -> 1300 in this setup ?
You're talking about the frag_size check in br_nf_ip_fragment(), right ?
From: Rundong Ge <hidden> Date: 2019-07-30 13:50:19
How can a bridge forward a frame from A/B to mtu1300?
It is free for user to set different MTU for bridge ports. In our case
only tcp traffic between A/B and mtu 1300, and mss negotiation can
make packets less than 1300.
What happens without netfilter or non-fragmented packets?
Without br_netfilter it works fine, there is no defragmentation and
refragmentation, fragmented packets will egress directly.
Florian Westphal [off-list ref] 于2019年7月30日周二 下午8:35写道：
Rundong Ge [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
How can a bridge forward a frame from A/B to mtu1300?
quoted
With netfilter defragmentation/conntrack enabled, fragmented
packets from A will be defragmented in prerouting, and refragmented
at postrouting.
Yes, but I don't see how that relates to the problem at hand.
quoted
But in this scenario the bridge found the frag_max_size(1500) is
larger than the dst mtu stored in the fake_rtable whitch is
always equal to the bridge's mtu 1300, then packets will be dopped.
What happens without netfilter or non-fragmented packets?
quoted
This modifies ip_skb_dst_mtu to use the out dev's mtu instead
of bridge's mtu in bridge refragment.
It seems quite a hack? The above setup should use a router, not a bridge.
From: Rundong Ge <hidden> Date: 2019-07-30 13:58:43
Yes it is about the frag_size check in br_nf_ip_fragment(). As i said
without br_netfilter the packets forwarding is fine.
And I feel it is weird that br_nf_dev_queue_xmit() use out dev's mtu
to decide whether to do the fragmentation, but
then br_nf_ip_fragment() use bridge's mtu to do the actual fragmentation.
And in this case fragmented packets fit the out dev mtu but were
dropped, I think it is not right.
Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] 于2019年7月30日周二 下午8:41写道：
On 30/07/2019 15:25, Rundong Ge wrote:
quoted
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
With netfilter defragmentation/conntrack enabled, fragmented
packets from A will be defragmented in prerouting, and refragmented
at postrouting.
But in this scenario the bridge found the frag_max_size(1500) is
larger than the dst mtu stored in the fake_rtable whitch is
always equal to the bridge's mtu 1300, then packets will be dopped.
This modifies ip_skb_dst_mtu to use the out dev's mtu instead
of bridge's mtu in bridge refragment.
Signed-off-by: Rundong Ge <redacted>
---
include/net/ip.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I don't think this is correct, there's a reason why the bridge chooses the smallest
possible MTU out of its members and this is simply a hack to circumvent it.
If you really like to do so just set the bridge MTU manually, we've added support
so it won't change automatically to the smallest, but then how do you pass packets
1500 -> 1300 in this setup ?
You're talking about the frag_size check in br_nf_ip_fragment(), right ?
From: Rundong Ge <hidden> Date: 2019-08-26 02:46:06
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:41 PM Nikolay Aleksandrov
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 30/07/2019 15:25, Rundong Ge wrote:
quoted
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
With netfilter defragmentation/conntrack enabled, fragmented
packets from A will be defragmented in prerouting, and refragmented
at postrouting.
But in this scenario the bridge found the frag_max_size(1500) is
larger than the dst mtu stored in the fake_rtable whitch is
always equal to the bridge's mtu 1300, then packets will be dopped.
This modifies ip_skb_dst_mtu to use the out dev's mtu instead
of bridge's mtu in bridge refragment.
Signed-off-by: Rundong Ge <redacted>
---
include/net/ip.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
I don't think this is correct, there's a reason why the bridge chooses the smallest
possible MTU out of its members and this is simply a hack to circumvent it.
If you really like to do so just set the bridge MTU manually, we've added support
so it won't change automatically to the smallest, but then how do you pass packets
1500 -> 1300 in this setup ?
You're talking about the frag_size check in br_nf_ip_fragment(), right ?
Hi Nikolay
My setup may not be common. And may I know if there is any reason to
use output port's MTU
to do the re-fragment check but then use the bridge's MTU to do the re-fragment?
Is it the expected behavior that the bridge's MTU will affect the
FORWARD traffic re-fragment,
because I used to think the bridge's MTU will only effect the OUTPUT
traffic sent from "br0".
And the modification in this patch will replace the MTU in the
fake_rtable which is only
used in the FORWARD re-fragment and won't affect the local traffic from "br0".
TKS
Raydodn
From: Jan Engelhardt <hidden> Date: 2019-08-26 08:09:26
On Tuesday 2019-07-30 14:35, Florian Westphal wrote:
Rundong Ge [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
How can a bridge forward a frame from A/B to mtu1300?
There might be a misunderstanding here judging from the shortness of this
thread.
I understood it such that the bridge ports (eth0,eth1) have MTU 1500, yet br0
(in essence the third bridge port if you so wish) itself has MTU 1300.
Therefore, frame forwarding from eth0 to eth1 should succeed, since the
1300-byte MTU is only relevant if the bridge decides the packet needs to be
locally delivered.
From: Rundong Ge <hidden> Date: 2019-08-28 09:22:00
Jan Engelhardt [off-list ref] 于2019年8月26日周一 下午3:59写道：
On Tuesday 2019-07-30 14:35, Florian Westphal wrote:
quoted
Rundong Ge [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Given following setup:
-modprobe br_netfilter
-echo '1' > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
-brctl addbr br0
-brctl addif br0 enp2s0
-brctl addif br0 enp3s0
-brctl addif br0 enp6s0
-ifconfig enp2s0 mtu 1300
-ifconfig enp3s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig enp6s0 mtu 1500
-ifconfig br0 up
multi-port
mtu1500 - mtu1500|bridge|1500 - mtu1500
A | B
mtu1300
How can a bridge forward a frame from A/B to mtu1300?
There might be a misunderstanding here judging from the shortness of this
thread.
I understood it such that the bridge ports (eth0,eth1) have MTU 1500, yet br0
(in essence the third bridge port if you so wish) itself has MTU 1300.
Therefore, frame forwarding from eth0 to eth1 should succeed, since the
1300-byte MTU is only relevant if the bridge decides the packet needs to be
locally delivered.
Under this setup when I do "ping B -l 2000" from A, the fragmented
packets will be dropped by bridge.
When the "/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables" is on, bridge
will do defragment at PREROUTING and re-fragment at POSTROUTING. At
the re-fragment bridge will check if the max frag size is larger than
the bridge's MTU in br_nf_ip_fragment(), if it is true packets will
be dropped.
And this patch use the outdev's MTU instead of the bridge's MTU to do
the br_nf_ip_fragment.