macvtap vlan and tcp header overhead (and mtu size)

From: Marc Roos <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-28 13:09:39


I hope this is the right place to ask. I have a host setup for libvirt 
kvm/qemu vms. And I wonder a bit about the overhead of the macvtap and 
how to configure the mtu's properly. To be able to communicate with the 
host, I have moved the ip address of the host from the adapter to a 
macvtap to allow host communication. 

I have the below setup on hosts. 

                                              
                                +---------+   
                                | macvtap0|   
                             +--|   ip    |   
                             |  | mtu1500 |   
                             |  +---------+   
                 +---------+ |  +---------+   
                 |eth0.v100| |  | macvtap1|   
              +--|  no ip  +-+--|   ip    |   
 +---------+  |  | mtu1500 |    | mtu1500 |   
 |   eth0  |  |  +---------+    +---------+   
 |         +--+                               
 | mtu9000 |  |  +---------+                  
 +---------+  |  |eth0.v101|                  
              +--|   ip    |                  
                 | mtu9000 |                  
                 +---------+                  

https://pastebin.com/9jJrMCTD



I can do a ping -M do -s 9000 between hosts via the vlan interface 
eth0.v101. That is as expected.

The ping -M do -s 1500 macvtap0 and another host or macvtap1 fails. The 
maximum size that does not fragment is 1472.
That is 28 bytes??? Where have they gone? I am only using macvtap, can 
this be the combination of the parent interface being a vlan and that 
macvtap is not properly handling this? Anyone experienced something 
similar? Or can explain where these 28 bytes go?








Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help