[PATCH net-next] bnxt_en: Remove unnecessary unsigned integer comparison and initialize variable
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-05 20:13:38
There is no need to compare *val.vu32* with < 0 because
such variable is of type u32 (32 bits, unsigned), making it
impossible to hold a negative value. Fix this by removing
such comparison.
Also, initialize variable *max_val* to -1, just in case
it is not initialized to either BNXT_MSIX_VEC_MAX or
BNXT_MSIX_VEC_MIN_MAX before using it in a comparison
with val.vu32 at line 159:
if (val.vu32 > max_val)
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1473915 ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1473920 ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
index 8a10e01..140dbd6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int bnxt_dl_msix_validate(struct devlink *dl, u32 id, union devlink_param_value val, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { - int max_val; + int max_val = -1; if (id == DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MSIX_VEC_PER_PF_MAX) max_val = BNXT_MSIX_VEC_MAX;
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int bnxt_dl_msix_validate(struct devlink *dl, u32 id, if (id == DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MSIX_VEC_PER_PF_MIN) max_val = BNXT_MSIX_VEC_MIN_MAX; - if (val.vu32 < 0 || val.vu32 > max_val) { + if (val.vu32 > max_val) { NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MSIX value is exceeding the range"); return -EINVAL; }
--
2.7.4