[PATCH] vhost: fix VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctl request definition

Subsystems: the rest, virtio host (vhost)

STALE2926d

5 messages, 4 authors, 2018-09-04 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] vhost: fix VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctl request definition

From: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-03 18:07:18

The _IOC_READ flag fits this ioctl request more because this request
actually only writes to, but doesn't read from userspace.
See NOTEs in include/uapi/asm-generic/ioctl.h for more information.

Fixes: 429711aec282 ("vhost: switch to use new message format")
Signed-off-by: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <redacted>
---
 include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index b1e22c40c4b6..84c3de89696a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct vhost_memory {
 #define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 0x1
 
 #define VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x25, __u64)
-#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
+#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
 
 /* VHOST_NET specific defines */
 
-- 
glebfm

Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctl request definition

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2018-09-04 02:22:42

On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:59:13PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
The _IOC_READ flag fits this ioctl request more because this request
actually only writes to, but doesn't read from userspace.
See NOTEs in include/uapi/asm-generic/ioctl.h for more information.

Fixes: 429711aec282 ("vhost: switch to use new message format")
Signed-off-by: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <redacted>
Hmm it does make sense, and it's not too late to fix this up.
Jason, what's your take on this? Was _IOW intentional?

quoted hunk
---
 include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index b1e22c40c4b6..84c3de89696a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct vhost_memory {
 #define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 0x1
 
 #define VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x25, __u64)
-#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
+#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
 
 /* VHOST_NET specific defines */
 
-- 
glebfm

Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctl request definition

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-04 03:08:52


On 2018年09月04日 10:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:59:13PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
quoted
The _IOC_READ flag fits this ioctl request more because this request
actually only writes to, but doesn't read from userspace.
See NOTEs in include/uapi/asm-generic/ioctl.h for more information.

Fixes: 429711aec282 ("vhost: switch to use new message format")
Signed-off-by: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <redacted>
Hmm it does make sense, and it's not too late to fix this up.
Jason, what's your take on this? Was _IOW intentional?
My bad, not intentional. And I agree that fixing this is not too late.

So

Acked-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
quoted
---
  include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index b1e22c40c4b6..84c3de89696a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct vhost_memory {
  #define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 0x1
  
  #define VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x25, __u64)
-#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
+#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
  
  /* VHOST_NET specific defines */
  
-- 
glebfm

Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctl request definition

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2018-09-04 03:11:15

On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:08:40AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2018年09月04日 10:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:59:13PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
quoted
The _IOC_READ flag fits this ioctl request more because this request
actually only writes to, but doesn't read from userspace.
See NOTEs in include/uapi/asm-generic/ioctl.h for more information.

Fixes: 429711aec282 ("vhost: switch to use new message format")
Signed-off-by: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <redacted>
Hmm it does make sense, and it's not too late to fix this up.
Jason, what's your take on this? Was _IOW intentional?
My bad, not intentional. And I agree that fixing this is not too late.

So

Acked-by: Jason Wang <redacted>

OK then

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
quoted
quoted
---
  include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index b1e22c40c4b6..84c3de89696a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct vhost_memory {
  #define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 0x1
  #define VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x25, __u64)
-#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
+#define VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES _IOR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x26, __u64)
  /* VHOST_NET specific defines */
-- 
glebfm

Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctl request definition

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-09-04 04:23:49

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 23:11:11 -0400
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:08:40AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted

On 2018年09月04日 10:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:59:13PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
quoted
The _IOC_READ flag fits this ioctl request more because this request
actually only writes to, but doesn't read from userspace.
See NOTEs in include/uapi/asm-generic/ioctl.h for more information.

Fixes: 429711aec282 ("vhost: switch to use new message format")
Signed-off-by: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <redacted>
Hmm it does make sense, and it's not too late to fix this up.
Jason, what's your take on this? Was _IOW intentional?
My bad, not intentional. And I agree that fixing this is not too late.

So

Acked-by: Jason Wang <redacted>

OK then

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Applied, thanks everyone.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help