tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask is always an odd number, which is set in function
alloc_large_system_hash(). See bellow,
if (_hash_mask)
*_hash_mask = (1 << log2qty) - 1; <<< always odd number
Hence the local variable 'cnt' is a even number, as a result of that it is
no difference to do the incrementation here.
Maybe the compiler could also optimize it, but this code is a little ugly.
Fix: fee83d09 ("ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_max_syn_backlog knob")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 9e041fa..a9b7c4b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2543,7 +2543,7 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net)
net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_tw_reuse = 2;
cnt = tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask + 1;
- net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = (cnt + 1) / 2;
+ net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = cnt / 2;
net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo = &tcp_hashinfo;
net->ipv4.sysctl_max_syn_backlog = max(128, cnt / 256);
--
1.8.3.1
From: Yafang Shao <redacted>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 19:47:00 +0800
tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask is always an odd number, which is set in function
alloc_large_system_hash(). See bellow,
if (_hash_mask)
*_hash_mask = (1 << log2qty) - 1; <<< always odd number
Hence the local variable 'cnt' is a even number, as a result of that it is
no difference to do the incrementation here.
Maybe the compiler could also optimize it, but this code is a little ugly.
Fix: fee83d09 ("ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_max_syn_backlog knob")
The correct tag is "Fixes: "
quoted hunk
@@ -2543,7 +2543,7 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net)
net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_tw_reuse = 2;
cnt = tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask + 1;
- net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = (cnt + 1) / 2;
+ net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = cnt / 2;
net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo = &tcp_hashinfo;
This is completely harmless, and does no harm.
You aren't "fixing" anything.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:41 AM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Yafang Shao <redacted>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 19:47:00 +0800
quoted
tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask is always an odd number, which is set in function
alloc_large_system_hash(). See bellow,
if (_hash_mask)
*_hash_mask = (1 << log2qty) - 1; <<< always odd number
Hence the local variable 'cnt' is a even number, as a result of that it is
no difference to do the incrementation here.
Maybe the compiler could also optimize it, but this code is a little ugly.
Fix: fee83d09 ("ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_max_syn_backlog knob")
The correct tag is "Fixes: "
OK
quoted
@@ -2543,7 +2543,7 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net)
net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_tw_reuse = 2;
cnt = tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask + 1;
- net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = (cnt + 1) / 2;
+ net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = cnt / 2;
net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo = &tcp_hashinfo;
This is completely harmless, and does no harm.
It is harmless, meanwhile, it is useless and a little ugly.
By the way, why do we init sysctl_max_tw_buckets to
(tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask + 1) / 2 or (tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask + 2) / 2
?
Per my pespective, this default value is a little huge, sometimes we
have to set this value to a lower value with sysctl, otherwise it may
easily cause tcp port exhaustion issue.
So why not just init it to a lower value ?
You aren't "fixing" anything.