From: Miguel Rodríguez Pérez <hidden> Date: 2018-07-01 09:05:50
Remove some unneded varibles to make the code easier to read
and, replace the generic usb_control_msg function for the
more specific usbnet_write_cmd.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Rodríguez Pérez <redacted>
---
drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Hey,
I've encountered that same problem a few days ago, found this thread
and these (unmerged) patches, "ported" them to a more current version
of the kernel (wasn't much work, let's be honest), and I was wondering
if it would be possible to get them merged, because this is still a
problem with cdc_ncm.
Here's the three "up to date" patches (based on 5.8-rc5), they work
insofar as I'm running with them, the bug isn't there anymore (I get
ethernet multicast packets correctly), and there's no obvious bug. I'm
not a dev though, so I have no idea if these are formatted correctly,
if the patch separation is correct, or anything like that, I just think
it would be great if this could be merged into mainline!
On Sun, 2018-07-01 at 11:05 +0200, Miguel Rodríguez Pérez wrote:
quoted hunk
Remove some unneded varibles to make the code easier to read
and, replace the generic usb_control_msg function for the
more specific usbnet_write_cmd.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Rodríguez Pérez <redacted>
NACKED-BY: Oliver Neukum [off-list ref]
---
drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
index 178b956501a7..815ed0dc18fe 100644
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 04:43:11PM -0400, Wxcafé wrote:
Hey,
I've encountered that same problem a few days ago, found this thread
and these (unmerged) patches, "ported" them to a more current version
of the kernel (wasn't much work, let's be honest), and I was wondering
if it would be possible to get them merged, because this is still a
problem with cdc_ncm.
Here's the three "up to date" patches (based on 5.8-rc5), they work
insofar as I'm running with them, the bug isn't there anymore (I get
ethernet multicast packets correctly), and there's no obvious bug. I'm
not a dev though, so I have no idea if these are formatted correctly,
if the patch separation is correct, or anything like that, I just think
it would be great if this could be merged into mainline!
You need to submit them in a format they can be applied in, as well as
taking care of the issues that caused Oliver to not agree with them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your feedback! I'm not sure what you mean by "a format they
can be applied in", I'm guessing as three emails, with a single patch
each?
As for the issues that you mention, I'm guessing you mean applying v4
of Miguel's patches as found here (
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10501163/,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10507009/) rather than v3 as I did
here (I didn't notice there was a v4 fixing those issues, and reading
the previous messages in this thread I assumed they weren't considered
blocking. Or is there a problem left with v4 of the patches? There
doesn't seem to be any replies to the messages from 2 years ago)
Sorry for all my questions, I'm totally new to all this process...
Cheers
On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 08:06 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 04:43:11PM -0400, Wxcafé wrote:
quoted
Hey,
I've encountered that same problem a few days ago, found this
thread
and these (unmerged) patches, "ported" them to a more current
version
of the kernel (wasn't much work, let's be honest), and I was
wondering
if it would be possible to get them merged, because this is still a
problem with cdc_ncm.
Here's the three "up to date" patches (based on 5.8-rc5), they work
insofar as I'm running with them, the bug isn't there anymore (I
get
ethernet multicast packets correctly), and there's no obvious bug.
I'm
not a dev though, so I have no idea if these are formatted
correctly,
if the patch separation is correct, or anything like that, I just
think
it would be great if this could be merged into mainline!
You need to submit them in a format they can be applied in, as well
as
taking care of the issues that caused Oliver to not agree with them.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:13:18AM -0400, Wxcafé wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your feedback! I'm not sure what you mean by "a format they
can be applied in", I'm guessing as three emails, with a single patch
each?
We have loads of documentation about how to do this in the kernel tree,
you might want to read up on it starting at Documentation/process/
thanks!
greg k-h