[PATCH] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: remove redundant variable off

From: Colin Ian King <redacted>

Variable 'off' is being assigned but is never used hence it is
redundant and can be removed.

Cleans up clang warning:
warning: variable 'off' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
index 02e8982519ce..ac96ff40d37e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c

@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void bcm_sf2_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 				 struct phy_device *phy)
 {
 	struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv = bcm_sf2_to_priv(ds);
-	u32 off, reg;
+	u32 reg;
 
 	if (priv->wol_ports_mask & (1 << port))
 		return;

@@ -231,11 +231,6 @@ static void bcm_sf2_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 	if (priv->int_phy_mask & 1 << port && priv->hw_params.num_gphy == 1)
 		bcm_sf2_gphy_enable_set(ds, false);
 
-	if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
-		off = CORE_IMP_CTL;
-	else
-		off = CORE_G_PCTL_PORT(port);
-
 	b53_disable_port(ds, port, phy);
 
 	/* Power down the port memory */

-- 
2.17.1

From: Colin King <redacted>
Date: Wed,  4 Jul 2018 07:54:36 +0100

From: Colin Ian King <redacted>

Variable 'off' is being assigned but is never used hence it is
redundant and can be removed.

Cleans up clang warning:
warning: variable 'off' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>

Applied.

Hi Florian

I this a bug? It seems to be a result of moving to
b53_disable_port() in f86ad77faf.

Before you would handle the CPU port differently than a normal
port. After this change, there is no difference?

      Andrew

On July 4, 2018 4:25:20 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Florian

I this a bug? It seems to be a result of moving to
b53_disable_port() in f86ad77faf.

Before you would handle the CPU port differently than a normal
port. After this change, there is no difference?

This looks like a big indeed, I will check that next week.

-- 
Florian

Hi Andrew,

On 07/04/2018 07:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:

Hi Florian

I this a bug? It seems to be a result of moving to
b53_disable_port() in f86ad77faf.

Before you would handle the CPU port differently than a normal
port. After this change, there is no difference?

This is not a bug actually but it is not obvious because there was a
separate definition added in bcm_sf2_regs.h for port 8 named
CORE_IMP_CTL. The logic in b53_regs.h is:

#define B53_PORT_CTRL(i)                (0x00 + (i))

and due to the memory map used in bcm_sf2, that would translate into:

8 << 2 = 0x20 which is correct here and matches the definition of
CORE_IMP_CTL.

in fact, the new code is more correct because any port could be a DSA
CPU port, whereas before we assumed that port 8 == CPU port, which is
not necessarily true.

Thanks!
-- 
Florian