Fixes for the AIO poll revert
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2018-06-29 13:37:23
Two fixup for incorrectly reverted bits.
5 messages, 2 authors, 2018-06-29 · open the first message on its own page
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2018-06-29 13:37:23
Two fixup for incorrectly reverted bits.
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2018-06-29 13:37:36
The big aio poll revert broke various network protocols that don't
implement ->poll as a patch in the aio poll serie removed sock_no_poll
and made the common code handle this case.
Fixes: a11e1d43 ("Revert changes to convert to ->poll_mask() and aio IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
net/socket.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index a564c6ed19d5..85633622c94d 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c@@ -1133,6 +1133,8 @@ static __poll_t sock_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) __poll_t events = poll_requested_events(wait); sock_poll_busy_loop(sock, events); + if (!sock->ops->poll) + return 0; return sock->ops->poll(file, sock, wait) | sock_poll_busy_flag(sock); }
--
2.18.0
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2018-06-29 13:46:57
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
The big aio poll revert broke various network protocols that don't implement ->poll as a patch in the aio poll serie removed sock_no_poll and made the common code handle this case.
Hmm. I just did the revert of commit 984652dd8b1f ("net: remove
sock_no_poll") in my tree.
But I haven't pushed it out, and your patch is certainly smaller/nicer
than the revert.
That said, the revert does have the advantage of avoiding a
conditional in the network poll() function (at the cost of a more
expensive indirect call for when sock_no_poll actually triggers, but
only "odd" network protocols have that).
Hmm. I'll have to think about it.
Linus
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2018-06-29 13:54:10
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:46 AM Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:
Hmm. I'll have to think about it.
I took yours over the revert. It's just smaller and nicer, and the
conditional should predict fine for any case where it might matter.
Linus
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2018-06-29 13:37:42
From: Avi Kivity <redacted> io_pgetevents() will not change the signal mask. Mark it const to make it clear and to reduce the need for casts in user code. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <redacted> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> [hch: reapply the patch that got incorrectly reverted] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- include/uapi/linux/aio_abi.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/aio_abi.h b/include/uapi/linux/aio_abi.h
index d4e768d55d14..3c5038b587ba 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/aio_abi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/aio_abi.h@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct iocb { #undef IFLITTLE struct __aio_sigset { - sigset_t __user *sigmask; + const sigset_t __user *sigmask; size_t sigsetsize; };
--
2.18.0